The Use and Misuse of the Coefficient of Variation in Organizational Demography Research
By Jesper B. Sørensen. 2002
70 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Public Administration
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a83d8e5c33cc73305d7773d6040816d70b84655e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Gender Studies
- Katherine J Klein
- Zeou Hu
- Lin Tan
- Jungwon Kim
- Shangshu Qian
- George Serafeim
- Thibaud Lutellier
- Sameena Shah
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Zeou Hu
- Dane M. Christensen
- Lin Tan
- Jungwon Kim
- Shangshu Qian
- George Serafeim
- Thibaud Lutellier
- Sameena Shah
In Public Administration
- Zeou Hu
- Lin Tan
- Jungwon Kim
- Shangshu Qian
- Thibaud Lutellier
- Sameena Shah
- Yaoliang Yu
- David A. Harrison
Citations in the corpus
- Why is Corporate Virtue in the Eye of The Beholder? The Case of ESG Ratings (2021, background): “average rating would complicate inferences (Sørensen 2002) and induce a mechanical relationship between one of our hypothesized variables and our dependent variable.”
- What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. (2007, methodology): “Similarly, in the coefficient of variation, division of the SD by the mean expresses the idea that diversity on a given attribute matters less when resource D is typically high versus typically low (Sorenson, 2002).”
- Are My Deep Learning Systems Fair? An Empirical Study of Fixed-Seed Training (2021, methodology): “We normalize each technique’s bias values before Levene’s test to eliminate the impact of the average value [5, 28, 77, 91].”