Is the home range concept compatible with the movements of two species of lowland river fish

By D. Crook. 2004

142 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Effects of sampling regime on the mean and variance of home range size estimates. (2006, background): “Most animals use the same areas repeatedly over time (Darwin 1861), hence animal movements are often defined using the home range concept (Tufto, Andersen & Linnell 1996; Crook 2004; Jetz et al. 2004; Anderson et al. 2005), where the home range is the area used by an animal over a given time inter”
Memory keeps you at home: a mechanistic model for home range emergence (2009, background): “…et al. 2000, Foerster and Vaughan 2002, Martinoli et al. 2006), birds (reviewed by Greenwood and Harvey 1982, Weimerskirch 2007), reptiles (Arvisais et al. 2002, Heise and Epperson 2005), amphibians (Daugherty and Sheldon 1982, Crump 1986), fish (Rodriguez 2002, Crook 2004), and insects (Switzer”
Personality-dependent spatial ecology occurs independently from dispersal in wild burbot (Lota lota) (2015, background): “Although the documentation of this “mobile” behavioral type that continuously shift HR location is somewhat at odds with the traditional concept of restricted movement and fixed HR location (Gerking 1959), shifting HRs have been recorded in lowland river fish (Crook 2004).”
Tracking animals in freshwater with electronic tags: past, present and future (2013, background): “For example, fish telemetry data analyzed with home-range software led to important findings related to home-range establishment and shifts [152,153].”