Comparative Response to a Survey Executed by Post, E-mail, & Web Form
By Gi Woong Yun, Craig W. Trumbo. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun., 2006
661 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a823e51db0e924e140378d951838317c83702d27
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
- Dorine Andrews
- Blair Nonnecke
- J. Preece
- Sara Dolnicar
- Julianne Coleman
- Ondrej Mitas
- Nilam Ram
- S. Galea
Citations in the corpus
- Elementary Teachers’ Use of Graphical Representations in Science Teaching (2011, background): “Although some research suggests that overall response rates for e-mail surveys are somewhat lower than paper and pencil surveys (Anderson and Gansneder 1995), some studies have had response rates as high as 70% ( Yun and Trumbo 2000 ).”
- Participation rates in epidemiologic studies. (2007, background): “For example, some mixed mode studies give respondents the option of completing data collection in one of multiple ways, usually via mail or via the Internet (115, 117).”
- Taking a “Peak” at Leisure Travelers’ Positive Emotions (2012, methodology): “…solicitations, we recruited 25% of all individuals who participated in the leisure travel experiences, a higher percentage than similar studies (e.g., Fredrickson et al., 2008; Strauss-Blasche, et al., 2000) and not unusual for a mixed-mode survey with an e-mail component (Yun & Trumbo, 2006).”
- Electronic Survey Methodology: A Case Study in Reaching Hard-to-Involve Internet Users (2003, background): “Electronic surveys are increasingly common (Lazar & Preece, 1999) and results from electronic surveys can be the same as postal survey content results, with the advantages of speedy distribution and response cycles (Slaughter, Norman, & Schneiderman, 1995; Taylor, 2000; Yun & Trumbo, 2000).”
- Online Versus Paper (2009, methodology): “…u es ti o n n a ir e E m a il s u p er io r in … E m a il i n fe ri o r in … O th er f in d in g s Weible and Wallace 1998 800 1997 MIS professors ~ male and female, predominantly female compare results from mail, fax, email, and web form Internet use response speed — cost response rate…”
- Response Rates and Responsiveness for Surveys, Standards, and the Journal (2008, background): “Email response rates may only approximate 25% to 30% without follow-up e-mail and reinforcements.(6) E-mail surveys incorporating multimode approaches may yield response rates as high as 70%.”
- Comparing Mail and Web-Based Survey Distribution Methods: Results of Surveys to Leisure Travel Retailers (2005, background): “…differences to variables under study between Web and mail surveys (Basi 1999; Cobanoglu, Warde, and Moreo 2001; Couper 2000; Mertler and Earley 2003; Porter and Umbach 2001; Sax, Gilmartin, and Bryant 2003; Schillewaert, Langerak, and Duhamel 1998; Stanton 1998; Taylor 2000; Yun and Trumbo 2000).”