Conformational variability in the refined structure of the chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 Å resolution

By K. Braig, Paul D. Adams, A. Brünger. 1995

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Pavel V. Afonine
2. Paul D. Adams
3. Nigel W. Moriarty
4. T. C. Terwilliger
5. D. Liebschner
6. Nathaniel Echols
7. R. Grosse-Kunstleve
8. J. Headd

Citations in the corpus

• Towards automated crystallographic structure refinement with phenix.refine (2012, background): “…the data-to-parameter ratio at low resolution and therefore reduces the risk of overfitting (DeLaBarre & Brunger, 2006; for a practical example, see Braig et al., 1995; it has been noted that nearly half of the low-resolution structures in the wwPDB contain NCS copies; see, for example, Kleywegt &…”