Rupture Process of the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake

By C. Ammon, Chen Ji, H. Thio, D. Robinson, S. Ni, V. Hjorleifsdottir, Hiroo Kanamori, T. Lay, Shamita Das, D. Helmberger and 3 more. Science, 2005

725 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Multiple CMT source analysis of the 2004 Sumatra earthquake (2005, methodology): “Other source depths lead to shallower or steeper dips, with larger or smaller scalar moments, but no inversion fixed at depths between 14 km and 30 km leads to dips as steep as those estimated from slab contours (12 –18 ) [Ammon et al., 2005].”
Time‐reversal imaging of seismic sources and application to the great Sumatra earthquake (2006, methodology): “[8] After the deconvolution of the instrument response and a pass-band frequency filtering, 165 stations amongst the different networks of the FDSN (Federation of Digital Seismograph Network) were selected for the good quality of 2 of 4 their vertical records.”
A rupture model of the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake (2011, methodology): “We modeled the observations using a least-squares localsearch algorithm that is designed to construct the broad features in the rupture first, then refine the broad features by adding detail as the search progresses (Ammon et al., 2005, 2006).”
Source inversion of W phase: speeding up seismic tsunami warning (2008, background): “However, the disagreement is not as prominent as those seen in the commonly used body- and surface wave inversions (e.g. Ammon et al. 2005).”