Distinct representations of eye gaze and identity in the distributed human neural system for face perception
By E. Hoffman, James V. Haxby. Nature Neuroscience, 2000
1,299 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a7d05dc4316ef1f93e4b6602f6360326851b72e4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- ChrisD . Frith
- James V. Haxby
- Nancy Kanwisher
- Maria Ida Gobbini
- Rebecca Saxe
- Vittorio Gallese †
- R. J. Dolan
- Matthew D. Lieberman
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- James V. Haxby
- Nancy Kanwisher
- Maria Ida Gobbini
- Roxane J. Itier
- Alumit Ishai
- R. J. Dolan
- Rafael Malach
- Nathan J. Emery
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- ChrisD . Frith
- Maria Ida Gobbini
- James V. Haxby
- Uta Frith
- Alexander Todorov
- R. J. Dolan
- Nancy Kanwisher
- Peter Mende-Siedlecki
Citations in the corpus
- Social and emotional attachment in the neural representation of faces (2004, positive): “Perceiving eye gaze, an important clue for assessing the mental states and intentions of others, also modulates activity in the posterior superior temporal sulcus (Hoffman and Haxby, 2000; Puce et al., 1998) and the anterior paracingulate cortex (Calder et al.”
- Cells in monkey STS responsive to articulated body motions and consequent static posture: a case of implied motion? (2003, background): “In humans, imaging studies showed activation of the STS in response to aversion of eye gaze (Hoffman & Haxby, 2000), and to movement of the hands (Grafton, Arbib, Fadiga, & Rizzolatti, 1996; Rizzolatti et al., 1996), the face (Puce, Allison, Bentin, Gore, & McCarthy, 1998), and to point light…”
- Visual Imagery of Famous Faces: Effects of Memory and Attention Revealed by fMRI (2002, background): “, the STS) participate in the perception of eye gaze direction, speech-related lip movements, and expression (Puce et al., 1999; Hoffman and Haxby, 2000).”
- Separate Coding of Different Gaze Directions in the Superior Temporal Sulcus and Inferior Parietal Lobule (2007, positive): “Hence, it is possible that adaptation of gaze perception may affect the dorsal intraparietal sulcus, which has also been activated in fMRI studies of gaze perception [3, 4].”
- Eye remember you: the effects of gaze direction on face recognition in children and adults (2003, background): “Many cells in the monkey superior temporal sulcus (STS) respond selectively to the direction of seen gaze (Perrett & Mistlin, 1990).”
- A region of right posterior superior temporal sulcus responds to observed intentional actions. (2004, neutral): “…Vaina, Solomon, Chowdhury, Sinha, & Belliveau, 2001; Grossman & Blake, 2002; Beauchamp, Lee, Haxby, & Martin, 2002; Pelphrey, Mitchell, McKeown, Goldstein, Allison, & McCarthy, 2003) or body and face parts (e.g. Hoffman & Haxby, 2000; Hooker et al. 2003; Kilts et al. 2003; Pelphrey et al., 2003).”
- Center–periphery organization of human object areas (2001, result): “This association cannot be attributed to irregular mapping results, because both our maps of face and building-related regions, as well as our maps of central versus peripheral visual field representations, closely correlate with previously reported maps (face”
- Connectivity profiles reveal the relationship between brain areas for social cognition in human and monkey temporoparietal cortex (2013, background): “However, the human FFA is implicated in processing facial identity, whereas face-responsive areas in the human STS aremore associated with processing social clues from faces, such as eye gaze (13).”
- Implicit Trustworthiness Decisions: Automatic Coding of Face Properties in the Human Amygdala (2007, background): “The large body of cognitive neuroscience research on face perception focuses either on face categorization (e.g., Haxby et al., 2001; Kanwisher, McDermott, & Chun, 1997; McCarthy, Puce, Gore, & Allison, 1997) and recognition of facial identity ( Hoffman & Haxby, 2000 ) or on recognition of expressio”
- FFA: a flexible fusiform area for subordinate-level visual processing automatized by expertise (2000, background): “Also supporting the hypothesis that the FFA is involved in individuation of faces, attention to face identity (rather than to eye gaze) increases activity in the vicinity of the FF”