Design, Evaluation, and Analysis of Questionnaires for Survey Research: Saris/Design

257 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Measurement Error Models With Uncertainty About the Error Variance (2013, methodology): “Saris and Gallhofer (2007) discussed an analysis of the reciprocal effect between social and political trust with correction for measurement error.”
Can we Rate Public Support for Democracy in a Comparable Way? Cross-National Equivalence of Democratic Attitudes in the World Value Survey (2011, background): “…multiple indicator scales allow controlling for random and non-random measurement errors and test for the convergent and discriminate validity of the scale, as well as testing for cross-cultural invariance of meaning and scale use (Billiet 2003; Bollen 1989; Brown 2006; Saris and Gallhofer 2007).”
Testing for comparability of human values across countries and time with the third round of the European Social Survey (2010, methodology): “Saris and Gallhofer (2007) suggest that the invariance test in this study is too restrictive and provide an alternative test using ESS data (for applications see e.g. Knoppen and Saris, 2007).”
Choosing the Number of Categories in Agree–Disagree Scales (2014, methodology): “…Methods & Research 43(1) These models have been used for substantive research by many researchers since then (Költringer 1993; Scherpenzeel 1995; Scherpenzeel and Saris 1997; Alwin 1997) and still get quite some attention (e.g., Alwin 2007; Saris and Gallhofer 2007; Saris et al. 2010).”