Risk Perceptions, Risk Preference, and Acceptance of Risky Food

By Jayson L. Lusk, Keith H. Coble. 2005

328 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Plant Science, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a7522e15d6f443c74384ebb37a244262bbd60620

Citations in the corpus

• Are risk preferences stable? Comparing an experimental measure with a validated survey-based measure (2008, unknown): “ Lusk and Coble (2005) compared subject responses to survey questions onthe willingness to consume genetically-modified foods to subject decisions inalotterychoiceexperimentandfoundthattheexperimentalmeasurewassignificantly associated with risk-taking behavior.”
• Group and individual risk preferences : a lottery-choice experiment (2006, unknown): “, forthcoming; Lusk and Coble, 2006). Lusk and Cobble (2006), find mixed evidence concerning the influence of background risk on risk taking behavior whereas Harrison, List and Towe (forthcoming) observe that background risk increases risk aversion.”
• Consumer acceptance, valuation of and attitudes towards genetically modified food: Review and implications for food policy (2008, unknown): “Others, such as Lusk and Coble, 2005a), view voluntary labelling as clearly insufficient, concluding that European mandatory labelling has increased consumers' welfare.”