Walking the thin line between efficiency and accuracy: Validity and structural properties of the Dirty Dozen

By P. Jonason, Victor X. Luevano. 2013

138 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a74ee1b5695edfccd67a52e9057fcae9c40986e1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The emotional deficits associated with the Dark Triad traits: Cognitive empathy, affective empathy, and alexithymia (2013, result): “What this means is that we have conservative estimates of the true scores as noted previously in relation to the Dirty Dozen (Jonason & Luévano, 2013; but see Miller et al., 2012).”
A primer on the Dark Triad traits (2019, unknown): “It may be the case that the DD and the SD3 do not capture the full breadth of psychopathy—the DD only measures callous affect; both measures may not assess both primary and secondary psychopathy (Maples et al., 2014; Muris et al., 2017; but see Jonason & Luévano, 2013).”
Resources, Harshness, and Unpredictability (2016, background): “Prior research suggests there may be a higher order latent Dark Triad factor that accounts for the shared variance in the traits (Figueredo et al., 2015; Jonason, Kaufman, Webster, & Geher, 2013; Jonason & Luévano, 2013; Jonason & Webster, 2010).”
The Dark Triad and trait self-objectification as predictors of men's use and self-presentation behaviors on social networking sites (2015, background): “Although there is considerable evidence for the validity and reliability of the Dirty Dozen (Jonason & Luévano, 2013; Jonason & Webster, 2010), the short form does not capture the nuances of the full measures and may be less sensitive (Miller et al., 2012), particularly in terms of the nuanced diffe”
Dirty Dozen vs. the H factor: Comparison of the Dark Triad and Honesty–Humility in prosociality, religiosity, and happiness (2014, background): “The DTDD has been shown to have internal consistency and test–retest reliability, and construct and convergent validity (Jonason, Kaufman, Webster, & Geher, 2013; Jonason & Luévano, 2013; Jonason & McCain, 2012; Jonason & Webster, 2010).”
The Dark Triad, happiness and subjective well-being (2014, background): “Jonason and Luéano (2013) accept this critique, noting they seek to estimate complex traits using only a few items per dimension, leading to a loss of resolution.”
Crowdsourcing research: Data collection with Amazon’s Mechanical Turk (2018, background): “…(Holden, Dennie, & Hicks, 2013), body size estimation and body dissatisfaction (Gardner, Brown, & Boice, 2012), Machiavellianism and narcissism, (Jonason & Luévano, 2013; Jones & Paulhus, 2014), the Positive Affect Negative Affect Schedule, the Happiness-Depression Scale (Schütz et al., 2013),…”