Youth justice conferencing and reoffending

By H. Hayes, Kathleen Daly. 2003

161 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a74ad6452f947855ad95ae6fd127ce44877a0247

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. N. Rodriguez
2. E. McGarrell
3. N. Hipple
4. B. Lind
5. G. Luke
6. Martin Bouchard
7. H. Hayes

In Sociology and Political Science

1. N. Rodriguez
2. Martin Bouchard
3. E. McGarrell
4. N. Hipple
5. B. Lind
6. G. Luke
7. Carlo Morselli
8. H. Hayes

Citations in the corpus

• Can At-Risk Youth Be Diverted From Crime? (2016, background): “Some evidence suggests that RJ is perceived as more legitimate than is the traditional criminal justice process (e.g., Hayes & Daly, 2003; Kuo, Longmire, & Cuvelier, 2010; McCold, 2003; Sherman, Strang, & Woods, 2000; Umbreit & Coates, 1993).”
• Restorative Justice at Work: Examining the Impact of Restorative Justice Resolutions on Juvenile Recidivism (2007, background): “Also, offenders with a prior offending history were more likely to reoffend than offenders with no prior offending history, and type of offense (violent or property offense) had no significant impact on recidivism (Hayes & Daly, 2003).”
• Family Group Conferencing and Re‐Offending Among First‐Time Juvenile Offenders: The Indianapolis Experiment (2007, methodology): “As noted at the outset, Hayes and Daly (2003) remind us that research is needed to address the question of whether family group conferences “work” in terms of reducing re-offending.”
• Assessing Reoffending in Restorative Justice Conferences (2005, background): “In South Australia, Hayes and Daly (2003) analysed data collected for the SAJJ project (Daly, 2001; Daly et al., 1998) to examine how features of family conferences, as THE AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY well as offender characteristics (e.g., age, gender, race and prior…”
• Reducing Juvenile Crime: Conferencing versus Court (2002, result): “Studies by Hayes and Daly (2001) in South Australia, and Maxwell and Morris (2001) in New Zealand, focused on whether certain characteristics of conferencing resulted in lower recidivism rather than comparing conferences with other outcomes.”