ESTIMATING DISPERSAL FROM PATTERNS OF SPREAD: SPATIAL AND LOCAL CONTROL OF LAKE INVASIONS

By J. Havel, Jonathan B. Shurin, John R. Jones. 2002

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Environmental Chemistry, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a73f1369124e663aef04227c00287fd8dd02c5ce

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. J. Figuerola
2. A. Green
3. H. MacIsaac
4. J. Muirhead
5. J. Havel
6. J. Norberg
7. C. B. Meyer
8. S. Dullinger

In Environmental Chemistry

1. H. MacIsaac
2. J. Muirhead
3. J. Havel
4. A. Green
5. J. Figuerola
6. M. Leibold
7. J. Norberg
8. J. Bossenbroek

In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

1. A. Green
2. Wilfried Thuiller
3. H. MacIsaac
4. David L. Strayer

Citations in the corpus

• Integrating species distribution models and interacting particle systems to predict the spread of an invasive alien plant (2010, background): “Second, spread probabilities for ragweed were derived from patterns of empirical data on a purely phenomenological basis (cf. Havel et al., 2002; Gilbert et al., 2004; Meentemeyer et al., 2008).”
• Ecological and evolutionary significance of dispersal by freshwater invertebrates (2003, background): “In most of these species, it is obvious that recreational boating and intercontinental commerce disperse more individuals than natural passive processes (e.g. Johnson et al. 2001; Havel et al. 2002).”
• Recent advances in the study of long‐distance dispersal of aquatic invertebrates via birds (2005, background): “The observed dispersal kernel for D. lumholtzi in reservoirs is consistent with transport by birds (as well as other vectors), because invasion is more likely within 20–30 km of source populations (Havel et al., 2002), and the majority of bird movements occur below this threshold.”
• Studying invasion: have we missed the boat? (2005, background): “Jenkins & Buikema 1998; Ca ´ceres & Soluk 2002; Havel et al. 2002 ).”
• The spatial spread of invasions: new developments in theory and evidence (2004, background): “At larger scales, the colonization of lakes by exoticDaphnia is affected by distances between lakes (Havel et al. 2002), and the spread of the tree pathogen Phytophthora lateralis depends on both connectivity by roads and distances between trees (Jules et al. 2002).”
• BACKCASTING AND FORECASTING BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS OF INLAND LAKES (2004, background): “Success may be reduced further if arriving propagules are discharged at sites that are physically or chemically mismatched to the requirements of the species (Smith et al. 1999, Havel et al. 2002).”
• The relative importance of local conditions and regional processes in structuring aquatic plant communities (2010, background): “Both environmental conditions and dispersal influence zooplankton ( Havel, Shurin & Jones, 2002; Cottenie et al., 2003; Beisner et al., 2006; Thum & Stemberger, 2006), macroinvertebrates (Mykra et al., 2007) and macrophytes (this study).”
• Patterns and Pathways in the Post-Establishment Spread of Non-Indigenous Aquatic Species: The Slowing Invasion of North American Inland Lakes by the Zebra Mussel (2006, background): “D. lumholtzi increased its distribution from 6 to 34% of sampled lakes over a 6-year period (Havel et al. 2002).”
• Biodiversity in metacommunities: Plankton as complex adaptive systems? (2004, background): “For example, Havel et al. (2002) have evaluated the dispersal kernel of an invasive Daphnia species and found that it only dissipates at a distance of ;20 km.”
• Aquatic invasive species: challenges for the future (2015, methodology): “For instance, logistic regression models using multiple years of Daphnia lumholtzi distributions, together with environmental data for ca. 100 reservoirs, revealed that the chance of new invasions declined rapidly for reservoirs more than 20 km away from source populations (Havel et al., 2002).”
• A comparison-shopper's guide to connectivity metrics (2004, background): “…represents the distance after which a species' probability of dispersal is assumed to decline rapidly (van Langvelde 2000), while a dispersal kernel is a function describing the relationship between dispersal distance and a species' probability of dispersal (eg Kot et al. 1996; Havel et al. 2002).”
• Accuracy of resource selection functions across spatial scales (2006, background): “…to assess biodiversity hotspots (Grand et al ., 2004), calculate expected extinction rates (Carroll et al ., 2004; Epps et al ., 2004), guide re-introduction efforts (Harig & Fausch, 2002; Schadt et al ., 2002), and predict spread of invasive species (Havel et al ., 2002; Thuiller et al ., 2005).”