Ecological and evolutionary significance of dispersal by freshwater invertebrates

By Andrew J. Bohonak, David G. Jenkins. 2003

550 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a3e11e704bf93b930edb2663d1abd7a4605b8ad5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. J. Heino
2. L. Brendonck
3. Bram Vanschoenwinkel
4. M. Soons
5. A. Green
6. Ran Nathan
7. G. Grenouillet
8. J. Soininen

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. J. Heino
2. M. Soons
3. Ran Nathan
4. L. Brendonck
5. Bram Vanschoenwinkel
6. A. Green
7. J. Soininen
8. J. Figuerola

Citations in the corpus

• Connectivity, scale‐dependence, and the productivity–diversity relationship (2004, background): “Although a considerable amount of research has been done on dispersal among freshwater invertebrates, there are few general conclusions (Bohonak & Jenkins 2003).”
• Recent advances in the study of long‐distance dispersal of aquatic invertebrates via birds (2005, background): “These studies have revealed major variation between taxa in their potential to disperse to and colonize new habitats at local scales (< 1 km), as well as evidence that zooplankton communities rapidly saturate and resist invasion by further species (Bohonak & Jenkins, 2003; Havel & Shurin, 2004).”
• Environmental warming increases invasion potential of alpine lake communities by imported species (2005, background): “Although many freshwater invertebrates can disperse across relatively flat, small (e.g. o10 km) spatial scales (Shurin, 2000; Cáceres & Soluk, 2002; Bohonak & Jenkins, 2003), dispersal limitation is expected at larger geographic scales (Shurin et al., 2000; Havel & Shurin, 2004) and across…”
• Does size matter for dispersal distance (2007, background): “…of what is written regarding dispersal of tiny organisms is inherited myth of potential dispersal and lacks supporting data on realized dispersal (Bohonak & Jenkins, 2003), though multiple investigators are working to overcome this using novel approaches (Bilton et al., 2001; Figuerola et al.,…”
• A trait-based approach to assess the vulnerability of European aquatic insects to climate change (2013, background): “Although recently new insights have been gained (Bohonak & Jenkins, 2003), empirical data on dispersal abilities are still scarce and the topic is mainly approached from mechanistically driven hypotheses, whereas behavioral aspects in freshwater insects remain largely neglected.”
• Long‐distance biological transport processes through the air: can nature's complexity be unfolded in silico? (2005, background): “…vector for aquatic invertebrates has been questioned, mostly resulting from the seemingly inherent inefficiency of random deposition by wind, as compared to directed (targeted) dispersal by waterfowl and other animal vectors (Bilton et al., 2001; Bohonak & Jenkins, 2003; Green & Figuerola, 2005).”
• Control of stream insect assemblages: roles of spatial configuration and local environmental factors (2008, background): “Although it has been suggested that stream invertebrates in general possess strong dispersal powers at the within-drainage basin scale ( Palmer et al. , 1996 ), information about the actual dispersal rates and distances for most freshwater species are lacking entirely ( Bohonak & Jenkins, 2003 ).”
• Slow, but steady: dispersal of freshwater molluscs (2011, background): “Only a few reviews on dispersal include molluscs; even then, molluscs are treated only marginally (e.g., Bilton et al. 2001; Bohonak and Jenkins 2003; Holeck et al. 2004).”
• Seasonal flow variation allows 'time-sharing' by disparate aquatic insect communities in montane desert streams (2007, background): “These diapause periods provide a form of temporal dispersal and are functionally equivalent to spatial dispersal in streams with headwater source populations ( Bohonak & Jenkins, 2003 ).”
• Broad-scale patterns of invertebrate richness and community composition in temporary rivers: effects of flow intermittence (2014, background): “…and Coleoptera 317 decreased with FI; many species in these groups are susceptible to desiccation (Williams 318 2006, Datry et al. 2012) and have resilient traits that facilitate recolonization, such as long 319 life-span or strong flying abilities (Petersen et al. 1999, Bohonak and Jenkins 2003).”
• Dispersal of adult aquatic insects in catchments of differing land use (2004, methodology): “1991; Bohonak & Jenkins 2003).”