An improved measurement of the flux distribution of the Lyα forest in QSO absorption spectra: the effect of continuum fitting, metal contamination and noise properties

By T.-S. Kim, J. Bolton, M. Viel, M. Haehnelt, R. P. L. F. A. Potsdam, Potsdam, Heidelberg · Germany, I. O. Astronomy, Cambridge, UK. and 5 more. 2007

138 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We have performed an extensive Voigt profile analysis of the neutral hydrogen (H i) and metal absorption present in a sample of 18 high-resolution, high signal-to-noise ratio quasi-stellar object (QSO) spectra observed with the Very Large Telescope Ultraviolet and Visual Echelle Spectrograph. We use this analysis to separate the metal contribution from the H absorption and present an improved measurement of the flux probability distribution function (PDF) due to H i absorption alone at (z) = 2.07,2.52 and 2.94. The flux PDF is sensitive to the continuum fit in the normalized flux range 0.8 < F < 1.0 and to metal absorption at 0.2 < F < 0.8. Our new measurements of the flux PDF due to H i absorption alone are systematically lower at 0.2 < F < 0.8 by up to 30 per cent compared to the widely used measurement of McDonald et al., based on a significantly smaller sample of Keck High Resolution Echelle Spectrometer data. This discrepancy is probably due to a combination of our improved removal of the metal absorption and cosmic variance, since variations in the flux PDF between different lines-of-sight are large. The H effective optical depth τ eff Ht at 1.7 < z < 4 is best fit with a single power law, τ eff HI = (0.0023 ± 0.0007)(1 + z) 365±0.21 , in good agreement with previous measurements from comparable data. As also found previously, the effect of noise on the flux distribution is not significant in high-resolution, high signal-to-noise ratio data.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a6e236dee3e577a5bb2c0e857146287db9c3ed66

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. M. McQuinn
  2. C. Faucher-Giguére
  3. George D. Becker
  4. L. Hernquist
  5. P. Hopkins
  6. A. Meiksin
  7. P. Madau
  8. A. Mesinger

Citations in the corpus