A Direct Precision Measurement of the Intergalactic Lyα Opacity at 2 ≤ z ≤ 4.2

By C. Faucher-Giguére, J. Xavier Prochaska, A. Lidz, L. Hernquist, M. Zaldarriaga. 2007

207 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We measure the evolution of the intergalactic Lyα effective optical depth, τeff, over the redshift range 2 ⩽ z⩽ 4.2 from a sample of 86 high-resolution, high-S/N quasar spectra obtained with the ESI and HIRES spectrographs on Keck and with the MIKE spectrograph on Magellan. This represents an improvement over previous analyses of the Lyα forest from high-resolution spectra in this redshift interval of a factor of 2 in the size of the data set alone. We pay particular attention to robust error estimation and extensively test for systematic effects. We find that our estimates of the quasar continuum levels in the Lyα forest obtained by spline fitting are systematically biased low, with the magnitude of the bias increasing with redshift, but that this bias can be accounted for using mock spectra. The mean fractional error ⟨ Δ C/Ctrue⟩ is <1% at z = 2, 4% at z = 3, and 12% at z = 4. Previous measurements of τeff at z≳ 3 based on directly fitting the quasar continua in the Lyα forest, which have generally neglected this effect, are therefore likely biased low. We provide estimates of the level of absorption arising from metals in the Lyα forest based on both direct and statistical metal removal results in the literature, finding that this contribution is ≈6%-9% at z = 3 and decreases monotonically with redshift. The high precision of our measurement, attaining 3% in redshift bins of width Δ z = 0.2 around z = 3, indicates significant departures from the best-fit power-law redshift evolution [τeff = 0.0018(1 + z)3.92, when metals are left in], particularly near z = 3.2. The observed downward departure is statistically consistent with a similar feature detected in a precision statistical measurement using SDSS spectra by Bernardi and coworkers using an independent approach.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/35ddb11ab70275cea7afc50a07a029ba76e7b1bd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. L. Hernquist
  2. P. Hopkins
  3. Volker Springel
  4. C. Faucher-Giguére
  5. M. McQuinn
  6. M. Vogelsberger
  7. D. Keres̆
  8. R. Somerville

In Instrumentation

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. Volker Springel
  4. R. Somerville
  5. M. Vogelsberger
  6. D. Keres̆
  7. C. Faucher-Giguére
  8. M. McQuinn

Citations in the corpus