Recognition of Composite Human Activities through Context-Free Grammar Based Representation
By Michael S. Ryoo, Jake K. Aggarwal. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2006
295 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Human-Computer Interaction
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a6e1a68340951785c7aa3d3ba7a99d64a997a2ef
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Andrew Zisserman
- Cordelia Schmid
- Luc Van Gool
- Li Fei-Fei
- Bernt Schiele
- Abhinav Kumar Gupta
- Trevor Darrell
- Ivan Laptev
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Luc Van Gool
- Andrew Zisserman
- Dacheng Tao
- Ming-Hsuan Yang
- Trevor Darrell
- Li Fei-Fei
- Cordelia Schmid
- Jitendra Malik
In Human-Computer Interaction
- Andrew Zisserman
- Yun Raymond Fu
- Song-Chun Zhu
- Anupam Agrawal
- Sarvesh Vishwakarma
- Ivan Laptev
- Ramalingam Chellappa
- Yu Kong
Citations in the corpus
- Modeling Complex Temporal Composition of Actionlets for Activity Prediction (2012, background): “Grammar based methods [5, 6] show effectiveness for composite human activity recognition.”
- A survey on activity recognition and behavior understanding in video surveillance (2013, methodology): “Police guards may not keep surveillance S. Vishwakarma ( ) · A. Agrawal Indian Institute of Information Technology, Allahabad, India e-mail: rs51@iiita.ac.in A. Agrawal e-mail: anupam@iiita.ac.in Present address: S. Vishwakarma N-297 Third Phase, Shivalik Nagar, BHEL, Haridwar, India e-mail: sarvesh”
- Interactive body part contrast mining for human interaction recognition (2014, methodology): “Series of researches proposed efficient methods based on RGB videos[2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9], but they have limitations of location and separation.”
- Hierarchical Recognition of Human Activities Interacting with Objects (2007, methodology): “Ryoo and Aggarwal [8]’s system was general enough to recognize continued human activities with any levels of hierarchy, but did not attempt to recognize human activities with objects.”
- Action2Activity: Recognizing Complex Activities from Sensor Data (2015, background): “A set of approaches have been proposed to explore the simple relations among actions [Yang, 2009; Liu et al. , 2016; Ryoo and Aggarwal, 2006].”
- Ieee Transactions on Pattern Analysis an Machine Intelligence Structured Learning of Human Interactions in Tv Shows (methodology): “Moving towards more realistic datasets, Ryoo and Aggarwal [15] represented an interaction by modeling relations between pairs of spatio-temporal features using spatial and temporal predicates, such as " before " , " after " , " near " or " far " .”
- Prediction of Human Activity by Discovering Temporal Sequence Patterns (2014, background): “In public areas, we want to equip a surveillance system that can raise an alarm in advance of any potential dangerous activity happens.”
- Weakly-Supervised Alignment of Video with Text (2015, background): “, in the form of Markov models or action grammars, has been used to constrain action prediction in videos [25, 27, 39].”
- Rank Pooling for Action Recognition (2015, background): “Although the aforementioned methods successfully capture the local changes within small time windows, they are not designed to model the higher level motion patterns and video-wide appearance and motion evolution associated with certain actions.”
- ActionVLAD: Learning Spatio-Temporal Aggregation for Action Classification (2017, background): “Modelling long-term temporal structure: Some methods explicitly model the temporal structure of the video using, for example, grammars [36, 40] but are often limited to constrained set-ups such as sports [21], cooking [38], or surveillance [5].”
- High-level event recognition in unconstrained videos (2012, background): “Most of them focused on human action/activity analysis, e.g., [1] by Aggarwal and Ryoo, [111] Poppe and [139] Turaga et al., where low-level features, representations, classification models, and datasets were comprehensively surveyed.”
- Human Action Recognition and Prediction: A Survey (2018, methodology): “To robustly find body parts, Ryoo and Aggarwal [133] utilized body part tracker to extract each individual in videos and then applied contextfree grammar to model spatial and temporal relationships between people.”
- Weakly Supervised Action Labeling in Videos under Ordering Constraints (2014, unknown): “in the form of Markov models or action grammars, have been used to constrain action prediction in videos [13,15,21,23,29,34].”
- Towards coherent natural language description of video streams (2011, background): “Ryoo and Aggarwal [20] presented an approach for automatic composite actions recognition based on context free grammar.”
- Machine Recognition of Human Activities: A Survey (2008, methodology): “Modeling two-person interactions such as pointing, punching, pushing, hugging, etc., was proposed by Park and Aggarwal [95] in a two-stage process.”
- Joint Video and Text Parsing for Understanding Events and Answering Queries (2013, background): “…structures of objects and scenes [21], [6], [22], [23], [24], [25], [7], [8]; temporal parsing recognizes the temporal compositional structures of events [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [9], [32]; and causal parsing detects the causal relations between events and fluent changes [33], [34], [10].”
- Understanding Video Events: A Survey of Methods for Automatic Interpretation of Semantic Occurrences in Video (2009, background): “several event domains including object manipulations [109] and two-person interactions [110].”