The moral significance of class

By Siobhán McGrath. 2007

636 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a6914659a624993475a669dfd3dc37b4f8bb38db

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Work, employment and society through the lens of moral economy (2013, background): “However, that does not mean that people’s engagement with economic and competitive principles of status and income have to be in conflict with their ultimate concerns, as they can also be a means to fulfil economic and social responsibility to others (Keat, 2000; Sayer, 2005).”
Habitus and the psychosocial: Bourdieu with feelings (2015, unknown): “There have been criticisms of Bourdieu ’ s concept of habitus for not engaging suf ﬁ ciently with the domain of the affective (Sayer, 2005; Sweetman, 2003).”
The coherence of inconsistencies: Attitude–behaviour gaps and new consumption communities (2012, background): “The evidence from the communities lends further credence to Sayer's ( 2005 , p.”
Constructions of the working-class ‘Other’ among urban, white, middle-class youth: ‘chavs’, subculture and the valuing of education (2009, background): “Sayer (2005a) also claims that this border work is ‘particularly strong in groups that are anxious about their position’ in relation to those who are above and those who are below (see also Raisborough and Adams 2008).”
Trends in the Turn to Affect (2015, background): “…becoming reworked through the lens of affect as researchers begin to explore what Reay (2005) calls ‘the psychic landscape of class’ (Lawler, 2005; Sayer, 2005; Skeggs, 2005; Tyler, 2008), and what Svasek and Skrbris (2007) describe as the ‘passions and powers’ associated with migration and…”
Why Status Matters for Inequality (2014, background): “I noted earlier that effects of status beliefs depend on the extent to which the social context of an interpersonal encounter makes status beliefs implicitly salient to participants and relevant to their concerns in the setting.”
Sex-based harassment and organizational silencing: How women are led to reluctant acquiescence in academia (2018, background): “Value-laden judgements conveyed through discursive positioning can, thus, be ‘internalised by subjects and negate their sense of self’ (Sayer, 2005: 153).”