Go with the flow: tidal migration in marine animals

By R. Gibson. Hydrobiologia, 2003

248 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a671a71ddcf411cf3fd9176b3e3e30c785c8ecf8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

In Oceanography

Citations in the corpus

Confusion reigns? A review of marine megafauna interactions with tidal-stream environments (2015, background): “…which involves entering the water column and being passively transported with the current during one phase of the tide, and returning to the seabed during the opposing phase of the tide, resulting in net directional lateral movement (Metcalfe et al. 1990, Forward & Tankersley 2001, Gibson 2003).”
Chronobiology: implications for marine resource exploitation and management (2005, background): “…have also been made on species in inshore coastal seas where tidal streams are strong, with clear evidence emerging in several species of endogenous clock control of tidal rhythms of dispersal and recruitment behaviour (Zeng and Naylor, 1996a,b; Forward and Tankersley, 2001; Gibson, 2003).”
Chronobiology of Marine Organisms (2010, background): “In many cases the rhythmic patterns of swimming shown by estuarine species using selective tidal-stream transport have been shown to be at least partially under biological clock control (Wooldridge and Erasmus, 1980; Gibson, 2004), though whether this is the case with larval flounders and mysid crus”
Intertidal migration and habitat use by subadult Dungeness crab Cancer magister in a NE Pacific estuary (2006, methodology): “…systems have found that prey biomass is significantly greater in littoral areas than in sublittoral channels (See Table 1 in Gunderson et al. 1990), and migrating species are thought to benefit from increased foraging opportunities resulting from differences in prey abundance (e.g. Gibson 2003).”
Shell gaping behaviour of Pinna nobilis L., 1758: circadian and circalunar rhythms revealed by in situ monitoring (2008, background): “more, Gibson (2003) showed a review of species displaying behavioural rhythmic responses to exogenous cues not affecting the internal clock.”