Analysis of SSRs derived from grape ESTs

By K. Scott, P. Eggler, G. Seaton, M. Rossetto, E. Ablett, L. Lee, Robert J. Henry. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2000

576 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Food Science, Plant Science, Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a637c2d8eee7a244b6e7f2ef4587a5d2cf22276c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Plant Science

1. Rajeev K. Varshney
2. K. Semagn
3. A. Graner
4. A. Börner
5. Å. Bjornstad
6. R. Aggarwal
7. T. Mahendar
8. M. Sorrells

Citations in the corpus

• An SSR-based linkage map of Capsicum annuum (2006, result): “Previous studies have also shown that gene-based SSRs generally do not cluster (Scott et al. 2000; Blair et al. 2003).”
• A preliminary genetic analysis of fibre traits and the use of new genomic SSRs for genetic diversity in jute (2008, background): “…for low copy sequences, which are known to tolerate trinucleotide repeats in view of the triplet nature of the genetic code (Cardle et al. 2000; Scott et al. 2000; Gupta et al. 2003), although dinucleotide repeats are often most frequent in random genome sequences (Akkaya et al. 1992; Bell and…”
• Data mining for simple sequence repeats in expressed sequence tags from barley, maize, rice, sorghum and wheat (2002, background): “Transferability among species demonstrated in earlier studies (Herron et al. , 1998; Eujayl et al. , 2000; Scott et al. , 2000; Sorrells, 2000a, b) implies that SSR-ESTs have considerable potential for comparative mapping.”
• An overview of molecular marker methods for plants (2006, background): “…primarily on monocotyledonous crops (Kantety et al., 2002; Thiel et al., 2003; Varshney et al., 2002), although ESTs of a few dicot species have been explored for SSR mining (Eujayl et al. 2004; Morgante et al. 2002; Qureshi et al. 2004; Saha et al. 2003; Scott et al., 2000; Varshney et al., 2005).”
• Isolation of (AC)n-microsatellites in Vitis vinifera L. and analysis of genetic background in grapevines under marker assisted selection (2004, background): “1999; Di Gaspero et al. 2000; Scott et al. 2000; Pellerone et al. 2001; Lefort et al. 2002; Decroocq et al. 2003.”
• Genetic linkage maps of rose constructed with new microsatellite markers and locating QTL controlling flowering traits (2007, result): “This frequency is comparable to those obtained for Vitis (2.5%, Scott et al. 2000 ), maize and rice (1.5 and 4.7%, respectively, Kantety et al. 2002) and recently for the Rosaceae species (4%, Jung et al. 2005) but lower than those reported in Capsicum (10.5%, Huang et al. 2001) and wheat (7.5%, Ni”
• Genic microsatellite markers in plants: features and applications. (2005, methodology): “[ 9 ] also reported that there were polymorphism differences among microsatellites derived from the 30 UTR (most polymorphic at cultivar level), the 50 UTR (most”
• In silico analysis on frequency and distribution of microsatellites in ESTs of some cereal species. (2002, background): “This higher transferability has been demonstrated in grape [15] and sugarcane [18] at different taxonomic levels.”
• EST-derived SSR markers in Jatropha curcas L.: development, characterization, polymorphism, and transferability across the species/genera (2011, background): “However, they possess advantages like easy access, presence in gene-rich regions, and high level of transferability to related species (Scott et al. 2000; Rungis et al. 2004; Thiel et al. 2003) which enable these to serve as anchor markers for comparative mapping and evolutionary studies (Varshney e”
• Genic Molecular Markers in Plants: Development and Applications (2007, background): “Scott et al. 2000, Rossetto et al. 2002, Arnold et al. 2002, Decroocq et al. 2003”