What's wrong with virtual trees? Restoring from stress in a mediated environment
By De Kort, Al Anneloes Meijnders, A. Sponselee, W. Ijsselsteijn. 2006
278 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Sensory Systems, Human-Computer Interaction
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a61881769204256d4403b102b3efbc404c111f28
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
- William C. Sullivan
- B. Jiang
- Chun-Yen Chang
- Hao-ann Jane
- N. Bauer
- J. Honold
- Hanne Buhrkall
- Elke van der Meer
In Sensory Systems
- William C. Sullivan
- Hanne Buhrkall
- Fatemeh Saeidi-Rizi
- B. Jiang
- Olivia McAnirlin
- Colin Ellard
- Yue Pei
- H. Yoon
In Human-Computer Interaction
Citations in the corpus
- A dose of nature: Tree cover, stress reduction, and gender differences (2014, background): “D video of community streets in a movie theater, which makes the visual experience more immersive than watching the video on a regular TV screen or projector screen (De Kort et al., 2006).”
- Where to take a study break on the college campus: An attention restoration theory perspective (2009, background): “Large images of nature with rich content and coherent structure would likely evoke a sense of immersion in the environments and increase perceptions of being away and extent (deKort et al., 2006).”
- Inducing physiological stress recovery with sounds of nature in a virtual reality forest--results from a pilot study. (2013, background): “The higher the immersion of a VR system, the better the restorative potential that can be expected from the mediated natural environment [23].”
- Cognitive and affective responses to natural scenes: Effects of low level visual properties on preference, cognitive load and eye-movements (2015, background): “Lastly, the current study successfully replicated past research, suggesting that viewing nature scenes resulted in significantly higher positive affect compared to viewing urban scenes (De Kort et al., 2006; Ulrich et al., 1991; Valtchanov et al., 2010; Van den Berg et al., 2003).”
- The Role of Methodological Choices in the Effects of Experimental Exposure to Simulated Natural Landscapes on Human Health and Cognitive Performance: A Systematic Review (2020, background): “For instance, methodological decisions that pertain to the inclusion of natural and human-made landscape features and the frequency and duration of exposure are likely to influence study findings (de Kort et al., 2006; Jiang et al., 2014, 2016).”
- Restoration in Urban Spaces (2016, background): “It is consistent with experimental findings that views of nature reduce physiological activation (e.g., Chang et al., 2008; de Kort et al., 2006; Parsons et al., 1998).”
- Trees, grass, or concrete? The effects of different types of environments on stress reduction (2020, background): “, 1998), which previous research has shown can effectively induce measurable stress, in terms of both SCL and NA (de Kort et al., 2006), in a noisy environment. We told participants that the experiment’s purpose was to assess their performance on the MPA and that we would score and rank their perfor”
- Restorative Effects of Virtual Nature Settings (2010, unknown): “Here, we would like to make the distinction between ‘‘virtual nature’’ as described by de Kort et al., 16,17 which encompasses films of real nature presented on displays, and the computer-generated nature presented in immersive VR .”
- A comparison of the restorative effect of a natural environment with that of a simulated natural environment (2010, methodology): “The participants were seated at the table at a distance of 2 m from the TV-screen to enhance their feeling of presence during the slideshow, in accordance with a concept presented by de Kort et al. (2006).”