Digital Era Governance: IT Corporations, the State, and e-Government

By Patrick Dunleavy, Helen Z. Margetts, Simon Bastow, J. Tinkler. 2006

619 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Development, Economics and Econometrics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a60d723fe335c12398ecf2169461b7d69ef58774

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Development

1. Antonio Cordella
2. Federico Iannacci

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Antonio Cordella
2. Federico Iannacci
3. S. Osborne

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. Antonio Cordella
2. Federico Iannacci

Citations in the corpus

• Lean: A failed theory for public services? (2013, background): “Rather it had both changed the terrain on which this co-production is enacted (Dunleavy et al., 2006; Kinder, 2000; Pascu and Van Lieshout, 2009) and in some cases transferred power to service users and citizens by breaking down the professional and political control of key public service informatio”
• Co-Production and the Co-Creation of Value in Public Services: A suitable case for treatment? (2016, background): “Emerging new technology has offered service users potential routes to wrest (some) bottom-up control over public services from the policy, administrative and managerial structures (Dunleavy et al. 2006; Bekkers et al. 2011; Voorberg, Bekkers, and Tummers 2014).”
• A public value perspective for ICT enabled public sector reforms: A theoretical reflection (2012, background): “Despite the great expectations of the NPM reforms, the results of the adoption of these policies are at least questionable (Dunleavy et al., 2006b).”
• Information systems in the public sector: The e-Government enactment framework (2010, methodology): “By making government more accountable and transparent through this process of information rationalisation, e-Government is very often conceived as a powerful instrument to achieve the public administration reforms envisaged by the new public management (NPM) ideology (Barzelay, 2001; Cordella, 2007;”
• Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews (2019, background): “Two of the most foundational theoretical works framing the research are Fountain's technology enactment framework and Dunleavy et al.'s Digital Era Governance approach. Fountain's (2004) approach, in short, discusses the impact of technologies on organizations through an institutional perspective. S”