An updated simulation of particle fluxes and cosmogenic nuclide production in the Earth's atmosphere

230 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

9,400 years of cosmic radiation and solar activity from ice cores and tree rings (2012, methodology): “The details of this procedure are described in references (1, 17, 20).”
SOLAR INFLUENCES ON CLIMATE (2010, unknown): “On decadal to centennial time scales it is dominated by solar activity; on longer time scales it is dominated by the geomagnetic dipole field [Masarik and Beer, 2009].”
A new model of cosmogenic production of radiocarbon 14C in the atmosphere (2012, methodology): “…atom/g/cm2, which is essentially lower than earlier estimates of 2–2.5atom/cm2/sec.199 • We explain that the earlier models (including a recent modelby Masarik and Beer (2009)) overestimate the200 contribution ofα−particle and heavier GCR species to the14C production, because of the use of…”
A History of Solar Activity over Millennia (2008, result): “Another often used model (Masarik and Beer, 2009) yields a similar result.”
Scaling in situ cosmogenic nuclide production rates using analytical approximations to atmospheric cosmic-ray fluxes (2014, background): “Furthermore, some models exhibit significant deviations from measured atmospheric cosmic-ray spectra when considered over the full range of energies applicable to atmospheric and in situ cosmogenic nuclide production, or across the global range of environmental conditions (e.g., Goldhagen et al., 20”