MulVAL: A Logic-based Network Security Analyzer
By Xinming Ou, Sudhakar Govindavajhala, A. Appel. USENIX Security Symposium, 2005
777 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a5e9a804069a85a03c3720a9a7f0b88030c954dd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Barbara Kordy
- Chun-Jen Chung
- Ludovic Piètre-Cambacédès
- Pankaj Khatkar
- Patrick Schweitzer
- Emilio Ancillotti
- Tianyi Xing
- Marco Conti
Citations in the corpus
- Handling a trillion (unfixable) flaws on a billion devices: Rethinking network security for the Internet-of-Things (2015, methodology): “To this end, we can borrow ideas from attack graph analysis in the security literature [30,36].”
- Dynamic Security Risk Management Using Bayesian Attack Graphs (2012, background): “Our Bayesian attack graph models “why an attack can happen” rather than “how the attack can happen” [24].”
- The role of communication systems in smart grids: Architectures, technical solutions and research challenges (2013, methodology): “Obviously there are many tools to analyze vulnerabilities in traditional telecommunications networks [335] (e.”
- DAG-based attack and defense modeling: Don't miss the forest for the attack trees (2013, background): “Another one, called MulVAL [217], was actually developed for attack graphs (Section 5.”
- NICE: Network Intrusion Detection and Countermeasure Selection in Virtual Network Systems (2013, methodology): “The attack graph in the MulVAL is constructed by accumulating true facts of the monitored network system.”