The pragmatics of swearing
By Timothy B. Jay, Kristin Janschewitz. 2008
410 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Communication, Language and Linguistics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a5d6bf861794fcc0b8a6f82293bc502455570e44
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Yejin Choi
- Noah A. Smith
- Maarten Sap
- Swabha Swayamdipta
- Mohit Bansal
- Yulia Tsvetkov
- Luke S. Zettlemoyer
- Xuhui Zhou
In Communication
- Xuhui Zhou
- Noah A. Smith
- Yejin Choi
- Sencun Zhu
- Laura Vianna
- Yilu Zhou
- Swabha Swayamdipta
- Maarten Sap
In Language and Linguistics
- Xuhui Zhou
- Noah A. Smith
- Yejin Choi
- Sencun Zhu
- Laura Vianna
- Yilu Zhou
- Swabha Swayamdipta
- Maarten Sap
Citations in the corpus
- Annotators with Attitudes: How Annotator Beliefs And Identities Bias Toxic Language Detection (2021, background): “Given that vulgarity can be considered noncanonical or impolite language (Jay and Janschewitz, 2008; Sapolsky et al., 2010; DeFrank and Kahlbaugh, 2019), we hypothesize that annotators who score high on LINGPURISM, TRADITIONALISM, and who are more conservative will rate vulgar posts as more offensiv”
- How to do things with slurs: Studies in the way of derogatory words (2013, background): “…and social distance among interlocutors is correlated with a greater use of sarcasm (Jorgensen, 1996; Kreuz et al., 1999), banter (Leech, 1983), teasing (Drew, 1987), mock impoliteness (Culpeper, 1996), swearing (Jay and Janschewitz, 2008), and insults (Labov, 1972b; Slugoski and Turnbull, 1988).”
- The landscape of impoliteness research (2015, neutral): “…sex and bodily functions), together with its salient subtype swearing (also known as cussing ), has received relatively little focused attention in impoliteness studies (see Jay and Janschewitz 2008; Dynel 2012b; Christie 2013; see also short discussions in Bousfield 2010, and Culpeper 2010).”
- Detecting Offensive Language in Social Media to Protect Adolescent Online Safety (2012, methodology): “While there is no universal definition of "offensive," in this study we employ Jay and Janschewitz’s [4] definition of offensive language as vulgar, pornographic, and hateful language.”
- More than just a brain: emotions and the doctoral experience (2013, background): “Linguistic cues included the use of explicitly emotive language (‘I felt really irritated’; ‘it was humiliating’) and swearing since ‘[t]he main purpose of swearing is to express emotions, especially anger and frustration’ (Jay & Janschewitz, 2008, p. 267).”