Visual constraints in written word recognition: evidence from the optimal viewing-position effect

By Marc Brysbaert, Tatjana A. Nazir. 2005

106 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a5cd54ab9d6b2567ad20523ca8af46378da82ed7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Reinhold Kliegl
2. Antje Nuthmann
3. Ralf Engbert
4. Keith Rayner
5. Roger Levy
6. Shravan Vasishth
7. Ralph R. Radach
8. Kenneth Holmqvist

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Reinhold Kliegl
2. Ralf Engbert
3. Antje Nuthmann
4. Keith Rayner
5. Roger Levy
6. Nathaniel J. Smith

Citations in the corpus

• Tracking the mind during reading: the influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. (2006, background): “…because the middle position seems to be the optimal viewing position for a word–it is associated with minimum refixation probability (McConkie, Kerr, Reddix, Zola, & Jacobs, 1989) and requires the least presentation time in single-word recognition (see Brysbaert & Nazir, 2005, for a review).”