Personality: What Makes You the Way You Are

By Daniel Nettle. 2007

181 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Political Science and International Relations, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a5c00d2f70ad8a62b0b5e951e6ef8c90090a1013

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Colin G. DeYoung
2. Paul J Silvia
3. Patrick Bateson
4. Jordan B. Peterson
5. Emily C. Nusbaum
6. Rachael G. Grazioplene
7. Alain Morin
8. Dean Keith Simonton

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Patrick Bateson
2. Colin G. DeYoung

In Social Psychology

1. Emily C. Nusbaum
2. Paul J Silvia
3. Roger E. Beaty
4. Colin G. DeYoung
5. Jordan B. Peterson
6. Rachael G. Grazioplene
7. Kirill Fayn
8. Patrick Bateson

Citations in the corpus

• Play, Playfulness, Creativity and Innovation (2013, background): “other statements designed to assess different dimensions of personality (Nettle, 2007).”
• Our Twitter Profiles, Our Selves: Predicting Personality with Twitter (2011, unknown): “resourceful and persistent [26].”
• Cybernetic Big Five Theory. (2015, background): “…of researchers have proposed roughly similar theories regarding these functions, based on decades of relevant empirical data from questionnaire, cognitive, behavioral, and biological studies of personality (e.g., Denissen & Penke, 2008; DeYoung, 2010b, 2010c; MacDonald, 2006; Nettle, 2006, 2007).”
• Openness to experience and awe in response to nature and music: Personality and profound aesthetic experiences. (2015, background): “People low in openness to experience, in contrast, are more conventional, practical, and down-to-earth (Conner & Silvia, in press; Kaufman, 2013; Nettle, 2009; Swami & Furnham, 2014).”
• From madness to genius: The Openness/Intellect trait domain as a paradoxical simplex (2012, background): “Several preliminary versions of such models have been proposed (DeYoung, 2010a, 2010b; Nettle, 2006a, 2007; Van Egeren, 2009), and they rest on the premise, noted in our introduction, that the Big Five offer a reasonably comprehensive list of major categories of psychological function in which…”
• Personality Neuroscience and the Biology of Traits (2010, background): “…have produced many theories about the psychological functions underlying various traits, but only a few have attempted to identify the psychological functions underlying all of the Big Five (Denissen & Penke, 2008; DeYoung, 2010; DeYoung & Gray, 2009; Nettle, 2006, 2007; Van Egeren, 2009).”