What Kind of Economic Theory for what Kind of Economic Geography

By A. Amin, Nigel Thrift. 2000

300 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a5ab084817c3bd09f318eeba30b4f89726c84b7e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Political Science and International Relations

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Economic Sociologies in Space (2005, background): “(Amin and Thrift 2000, 8) While aspects of Amin and Thrift’s (2000) diagnosis have been contested (“Debating Economic Geography” 2001), the basic question that they posed is a pertinent, timely, and awkward one, even if the answer cannot be constructed in similarly pithy terms.”
Toward a relational economic geography (2003, background): “While this literature brings economic geography closer to the core ideas of neoclassical economics, Amin and Thrift (2000) have recently suggested another fundamentally different direction for economic geography, capitalizing on concepts and theories from other social sciences.”
Tourism, economic development and the global-local nexus: Theory embracing complexity (2001, background): “In recent years there have been growing attempts by economic, cultural and social geographers to reconceptualize their subdisciplines and embrace the ‘de-differentiation of economy and culture’ (Crang & Malbon 1996; Amin & Thrift 2000; Sayer 2000).”
Landscapes of Predation, Landscapes of Neglect: A Location Analysis of Payday Lenders and Banks (2003, background): “The chance to affect public-policy discourse has energized some corners of the discipline, generating calls for renewed effort to produce research bearing policy implications (eg, Martin 1999 ; Amin and Thrift 2000 ; Henry, Pollard, and Sidaway 2001 ).”
‘Nothing includes everything’: towards engaged pluralism in Anglophone economic geography (2010, background): “3 The Amin-Thrift debates Amin and Thrift’s 2001 paper ‘What kind of economic theory for what kind of economic geography?’ produced 11 responses; and their 2005 paper ‘What’s left? Just the future’ garnered reactions from Smith (2005), Harvey (2006), and Hudson (2006), as well as a reply by Amin and”
Social capital or analytical liability? Social networks and African informal economies (2005, background): “Rather than viewing networks as abstract models, Amin and Thrift (2000) emphasize the need to ‘avoid the common practice of seeing network organization as something novel.”
Practicing New Economic Geographies: A Methodological Examination (2003, background): “…geography and influenced empirical research in corporate geography (Yeung 1994, 2001b; McDowell 1997; Schoenberger 1997), political economy (Barnes 1995, 1998b; Scott 2000), the geography of finance (Leyshon 1998; Amin and Thrift 2000), and the geography of consumption (Crewe 2000; Jackson 2002).”
Evolution in Economic Geography: Institutions, Political Economy, and Adaptation (2009, background): “Some of these contributions have addressed the question of “what kind of evolutionary theory for economic geography?” to paraphrase Amin and Thrift (2000), while others have developed more specific propositions for empirical analysis and testing (Frenken and Boschma 2007; Bottazzi, Dosi, Fagiolo,…”
Indeterminacy in-decisions - science, policy and politics in the BSE (Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy) crisis (2001, background): “In demonstrating the potential importance of these works to a major public policy issue, this paper also adds to debates in geography over the policy relevance of geographical work and methods (see Martin 1999 2001 and Amin and Thrift 2000).”
Stretching Global Production Networks: The International Second-hand Clothing Trade (2013, background): “Conceptually understanding these links has occupied geographers who investigate “out of the long shadow of economics” the political, cultural and economic countenance of international trade (Amin and Thrift, 2000: 8; Fine, 2002; Harvey, 2006a).”
Beyond Soft Institutionalism: Accumulation, Regulation, and Their Geographical Fixes (2001, background): “…implies a recourse to contingency and contextuality in theory formation and a key role for geography in the configuration of any institutionalist mode of inquiry, not least through the growing appreciation of èvidence-based research' (Amin and Thrift, 2000; Barnes, 1999; ESRC, 1999; Martin, 2000).”