‘Nothing includes everything’: towards engaged pluralism in Anglophone economic geography

256 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

China's Landed Urbanization: Neoliberalizing Politics, Land Commodification, and Municipal Finance in the Growth of Metropolises (2014, background): “…has obvious limitations and that a common ground or trading zone needs to be opened up, taking seriously practices of “the others” so that “we are willing to listen to others without denying or suppressing the otherness of the other” (Barnes and Sheppard, 2010, page 194; Yeung and Lin, 2003).”
Advances in Geocomputation: Geocomputation 2015--The 13th International Conference (2015, unknown): “Moving forward, an engaged pluralism, as advocated by Barnes and Sheppard (2010), may be the most productive approach.”
Theorizing practice in economic geography: Foundations, challenges, and possibilities (2011, unknown): “By drawing upon but developing commonalities across very different epistemological perspectives – namely actor-network theory and critical realism – we wish to further advance the argument that some of the points of divergence and approach in contemporary economic geography are not as irreconcilable”