Agreeing to disagree.
By J. Walker. Nature Cell Biology, 2006
746 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a5a7868b4a1e4af23ee2f4ff03984ad89c4c7740
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Xuguang Simon Sheng
- K. Lahiri
- Yeon-Koo Che
- Navin Kartik
- Alastair Smith
- A. Stam
- T. Kelly
- Regional Services
Citations in the corpus
- Opinions as Incentives (2009, background): “viduals may simply be endowed with dierent prior beliefs (just as they may be endowed with dierent preferences), or they may update certain kinds of public information dierently based on psychological, cultural, or other factors (Tversky and Kahneman, 1974; Aumann, 1976; Acemoglu, Chernozhukov, an”
- Bargaining and the Nature of War (2004, background): “The common-priors assumption means that if A and B both see the same information, then beliefs about the state of the world converge (Aumann 1976).”
- The Epistemic Significance of Disagreement (2019, background): “The first to develop general results along these lines was Robert Aumann (1976).”
- Evolution of Forecast Disagreement in a Bayesian Learning Model (2008, background): “However, as noted by Sims (2003) and Williams (2003), the sticky-information model may not characterize 1 See Savage (1954) and Aumann (1976) for theoretical foundations for the hypothesis.”
- Foreign Affairs and Trade (2013, methodology): “For the $5 axiom system, the standard models are partition spaces (Aumann 1976, or, equivalently, Kripke structures where the possibility relation for each agent is an equivalence relation).”