Mental models of mechanical systems: individual differences in qualitative and quantitative reasoning.
By Mary Hegarty, Marcel Adam Just, I. R. Morrison. 1988
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- L. Beach
- Mary Hegarty
- Tim N. Höffler
- Peter W. Battaglia
- Josh Tenenbaum
- Tobias Gerstenberg
- Fred Paas
- Karl Täuscher
Citations in the corpus
- Explanation in Human-AI Systems: A Literature Meta-Review, Synopsis of Key Ideas and Publications, and Bibliography for Explainable AI (2019, neutral): “…and Wood, 2011; Gentner and Stevens, 1983; Gigerenzer, 1993; Gigerenzer, Hoffrage, and Kleinbölting, 1991; Halasz, and Moran, 1983; Hegarty, 2004; Hegarty, Just, and Morrison, 1987; Heller, 1994; Hilton, 1986, 1996; Hilton and Erb, 1996; Jamieson, 1996; Johnson-Laird, 1980, 1983; Kieras and…”
- Mechanical reasoning by mental simulation. (2004, background): “Many mechanical inferences are made on the basis of rules of mechanical reasoning that can be easily verbalized (for examples, see [2, 35 ]) or analogies to familiar situations [5].”
- Epistemic Strategies Causal Thinking in Expert and Nonexpert Judgment (1992, background): “Research on attitudes (Abelson, 1981) and stereotyping (McCauley, Sitt, & Segal, 1980), mental models for economics (Hogarth, Michaud, & Mery, 1980) and politics (Axelrod, 1976) as well as for physical processes such as electricity (de Kleer & Brown, 1983) and mechanics ( Hegarty, Just, & Morrison, ”