Validation of oligoarrays for quantitative exploration of the transcriptome

By V. Nygaard, Fang Liu, M. Holden, W. P. Kuo, J. Trimarchi, Lucila Ohno-Machado, C. Cepko, A. Frigessi, I. Glad, M. V. D. Wiel and 2 more. BMC Genomics, 2008

962 citations recorded by the source corpus.

BackgroundOligoarrays have become an accessible technique for exploring the transcriptome, but it is presently unclear how absolute transcript data from this technique compare to the data achieved with tag-based quantitative techniques, such as massively parallel signature sequencing (MPSS) and serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE). By use of the TransCount method we calculated absolute transcript concentrations from spotted oligoarray intensities, enabling direct comparisons with tag counts obtained with MPSS and SAGE. The tag counts were converted to number of transcripts per cell by assuming that the sum of all transcripts in a single cell was 5·105. Our aim was to investigate whether the less resource demanding and more widespread oligoarray technique could provide data that were correlated to and had the same absolute scale as those obtained with MPSS and SAGE.ResultsA number of 1,777 unique transcripts were detected in common for the three technologies and served as the basis for our analyses. The correlations involving the oligoarray data were not weaker than, but, similar to the correlation between the MPSS and SAGE data, both when the entire concentration range was considered and at high concentrations. The data sets were more strongly correlated at high transcript concentrations than at low concentrations. On an absolute scale, the number of transcripts per cell and gene was generally higher based on oligoarrays than on MPSS and SAGE, and ranged from 1.6 to 9,705 for the 1,777 overlapping genes. The MPSS data were on same scale as the SAGE data, ranging from 0.5 to 3,180 (MPSS) and 9 to1,268 (SAGE) transcripts per cell and gene. The sum of all transcripts per cell for these genes was 3.8·105 (oligoarrays), 1.1·105 (MPSS) and 7.6·104 (SAGE), whereas the corresponding sum for all detected transcripts was 1.1·106 (oligoarrays), 2.8·105 (MPSS) and 3.8·105 (SAGE).ConclusionThe oligoarrays and TransCount provide quantitative transcript concentrations that are correlated to MPSS and SAGE data, but, the absolute scale of the measurements differs across the technologies. The discrepancy questions whether the sum of all transcripts within a single cell might be higher than the number of 5·105 suggested in the literature and used to convert tag counts to transcripts per cell. If so, this may explain the apparent higher transcript detection efficiency of the oligoarrays, and has to be clarified before absolute transcript concentrations can be interchanged across the technologies. The ability to obtain transcript concentrations from oligoarrays opens up the possibility of efficient generation of universal transcript databases with low resource demands.

Subfields: Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a5714585351d42e862b9c7881a5b756f3a636ff9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Molecular Biology

Citations in the corpus

Serum MicroRNAs Are Promising Novel Biomarkers (2008, background): “We measured the serum levels of 28 microRNAs, including microRNAs reported to be placenta-specific [10,20] as well as broadly expressed microRNAs.”
Circulating microRNAs, potential biomarkers for drug-induced liver injury (2009, background): “The miRNA expression levels in liver tissues were distributed over 4 orders of magnitude, and a significant number of miRNAs were either not expressed or expressed at very low levels as described (24, 25).”
Involvement of members of the cadherin superfamily in cancer. (2009, background): “Expression analysis of miRNAs in normal human tissues showed that the miRNAs targeting ZEB family members are particularly abundant in epithelial tissues (Liang et al. 2007).”
MicroRNA based Pan-Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Recommendation (2017, background): “Studies have shown that miRNA from tissues with similar anatomical locations correlate well [20].”
An Analysis of Human MicroRNA and Disease Associations (2008, methodology): “We obtained the normalized gene expression profile of 345 miRNAs in 40 normal tissues that included specimens derived from brain, muscle, circulatory, respiratory, lymphoid, gastrointestinal, urinary, reproductive, and endocrine systems[15].”
Normalization of microRNA expression levels in quantitative RT-PCR assays: identification of suitable reference RNA targets in normal and cancerous human solid tissues. (2008, background): “First, miRNAs represent perhaps only 0.01% of the mass amount of total RNA in a sample, and this fraction can vary significantly across different samples (Liang et al. 2007).”
Chipster: user-friendly analysis software for microarray and other high-throughput data (2011, methodology): “In the case of a command line tool, instead of copying the tool code, one just adds a reference to the tool binary in the Chipster configuration file.”
RefGenes: identification of reliable and condition specific reference genes for RT-qPCR data normalization (2011, background): “More-over, reference genes are preferably selected from the complete genome rather than from a handful of commonly used reference genes.”