A choice experiment on alternative fuel vehicle preferences of private car owners in the Netherlands
By A. Hoen, Mark J. Koetse. 2014
294 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Pollution, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a5509817c3c937d69c8c2540074095dbeb5b59c6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Christian Thiel
- S. Hardman
- F. Liao
- Didier Soopramanien
- W. Ketter
- José M. Grisolía
- Gillian Harrison
- Bert van Wee
In Pollution
In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
- Christian Thiel
- S. Hardman
- F. Liao
- Didier Soopramanien
- José M. Grisolía
- Gillian Harrison
- Bert van Wee
- Fraser McLeay
Citations in the corpus
- Preferences for car sharing services: Effects of instrumental attributes and psychological ownership (2017, background): “In their study on car preferences, Hoen and Koetse (2014) made an inventory of the possible alternatives to the traditional vehicle with combustion engine, concluding that the electric car was the most interesting option available.”
- Should we stop meating like this? Reducing meat consumption through substitution (2016, background): “how the model designed can estimate the parameters with respect to another model), we also compared the strength of our fractional factorial design to the strength of a complete enumeration design, which considers all possible combinations of the attributes (Hoen and Koetse, 2014).”
- The impact of service and government-policy attributes on consumer preferences for electric vehicles in China (2019, methodology): “In comparison, Dagsvik and Liu (2009) include conventional petrol vehicles (PVs) and mention AFVs in their stated-choice scenario, and Qian and Soopramanien (2011) include BEVs, hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) (rather than PHEVs) and PVs, because both studies were conducted before the Chinese govern”
- Understanding the impact of reoccurring and non-financial incentives on plug-in electric vehicle adoption – A review (2019, background): “, 2013), Germany (Hackbarth and Madlener, 2013), the Netherlands (Hoen and Koetse, 2014), and China (N.”
- Consumer preferences for electric vehicles: a literature review (2017, background): “Apart from Chorus et al. (2013) and Hoen and Koetse (2014), none of the studies clarify whether the expected purchase was financed as a private or company car.”
- An exploratory policy analysis of electric vehicle sales competition and sensitivity to infrastructure in Europe (2017, background): “Nonetheless, our findings support evidence that early PiEV adopters are more likely to rely on home charging (Tran et al., 2013; Namdeo et al., 2014; Hoen & Koetse, 2014; Plötz et al., 2014; Campbell et al., 2012), and furthermore indicate the need for widespread infrastructural deployment as EV…”
- China’s new energy vehicle policies: Evolution, comparison and recommendation (2018, unknown): “These policies were intended to allow China to overtake advanced countries, but some problems have certainly lingered (Zhou et al., 2015; Hoen and Koetse, 2014).”