The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions.

By Julie L. Lockwood, P. Cassey, T. Blackburn. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2005

2,570 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a541ca523f2373692eecee5ab0b6d7f12f072c03

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Ecology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Paradox lost: genetic diversity and the success of aquatic invasions. (2007, result): “These results appear to be consistent with studies linking increased propagule pressure to invasion success [11], a connection that might be more than just demographic.Intheirreviewofpropagulepressureandinvasion success, Lockwood et al. [ 12 ] suggested that the relationship between propagule pressu”
Does Darwin’s Naturalization Hypothesis Explain Fish Invasions? (2006, background): “…proposed to explain this variation, including propagule pressure, reproductive capacity, broad environmental tolerances, prior disturbance in the recipient community, and release from natural biotic constraints (Kolar and Lodge 2001; Colautti et al. 2004; Levine et al. 2004; Lockwood et al. 2005).”
Ecophysiological traits associated with the competitive ability of invasive Australian acacias (2011, neutral): “…introduction (both frequency and magnitude) and the human use of the introduced species play an important role in the subsequent scale of invasion (Lockwood et al., 2005; Wilson et al., 2007; Carruthers et al., 2011; Castro-Dı́ez et al., 2011; Griffin et al., 2011; 1Department of Ecology and…”
Marine range shifts and species introductions: comparative spread rates and community impacts (2010, background): “…populations, and propagule pressure, or the total number and quality of individuals relocated, is one of the best predictors of introduced species establishment (Cassey et al., 2005; Hayes & Barry, 2008) and faster spread rates (Mack et al., 2000; Lockwood et al., 2005; Roman & Darling, 2007).”
Local Habitat, Watershed, and Biotic Factors Influencing the Spread of Hybridization between Native Westslope Cutthroat Trout and Introduced Rainbow Trout (2009, background): “…proliferation and current distribution of hybridized trout in the system, and many studies have shown that propagule pressure (the number and frequency of introduced individuals) plays an important role in the establishment and spread of exotic species (see Lockwood et al. 2006 for a review).”
Residence time and potential range: crucial considerations in modelling plant invasions (2007, background): “Similarly, recent studies of invasiveness have highlighted the importance of propagule pressure (i.e. the amount, frequency, and timing of reproductive material reaching a new area and disseminating within it) (Lockwood et al., 2005).”
Determinants of vertebrate invasion success in Europe and North America (2006, background): “…species was separately introduced; more exact data on propagule pressure were not consistently available (Veltman et al., 1996; Cassey et al., 2004c, 2005; Forsyth et al., 2004; Marchetti et al., 2004; Sol et al., 2005; reviewed by Kolar & Lodge, 2001; Fisher & Owens, 2004; Lockwood et al., 2005).”
The more you introduce the more you get: the role of colonization pressure and propagule pressure in invasion ecology (2009, background): “…separate releases or escapes and hence propagule pressure can be viewed as having two components: the number of introduction events (propagule number) and the number of individuals per introduction event (propagule size) (Pimm, 1991; Carlton, 1996; Veltman et al., 1996; Lockwood et al., 2005).”
A test of baker’s law: breeding systems of invasive species of Asteraceae in China (2011, background): “Even in the presence of suitable mates and pollinators, autonomous selffertilization might increase seed production (e.g. Rodger et al. 2010), and therefore, result in higher propagule pressure and invasiveness (e.g., Lockwood et al. 2005; Colautti et al. 2006).”
How successful are plant species reintroductions (2011, background): “, 1989; Fischer and Lindenmayer, 2000) and invasive species (Lockwood et al., 2005; von Holle and Simberloff, 2005) introductions.”
Saving camels from straws: how propagule pressure-based prevention policies can reduce the risk of biological invasion (2008, background): “Furthermore, strong evidence is emerging that propagule pressure determines both the scale of invasion extent and impact (Lockwood et al. 2005; Von Holle and Simberloff 2005).”
Changes in the plant community of a Brazilian grassland savannah after 22 years of invasion by Pinus elliottii Engelm (2011, background): “2001), increasing propagule pressure (Lockwood et al. 2005; Boulant et al. 2008; Pyšek et al. 2009).”
Mapping the global state of invasive alien species: patterns of invasion and policy responses (2017, background): “China, India, Brazil) seem to be the main recipients of IAS, along with islands that are former European colonies and which would have long histories of repeated species introductions or increased ‘introduction effort’ (Lockwood et al., 2005) (Figs 1 & 3).”
Hybridization of invasive Phragmites australis with a native subspecies in North America (2009, background): “For many species, multiple introductions to a new range (a component of propagule pressure) can increase invasion success by increasing genetic diversity and reducing genetic bottlenecks (e.g., Lockwood et al. 2005; Dlugosch and Parker 2008).”