Neo-Endogenous Rural Development in the EU

By C. Ray. 2006

274 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a52b06e3e3b3aa4a066e0fff1b87fb06839450e7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

1. S. Schneider
2. D. Maye
3. J. Kirwan
4. T. Haartsen
5. P. Niederle
6. S. Neumeier
7. G. Bosworth
8. W. Strahl

In Political Science and International Relations

1. D. Maye
2. P. Niederle
3. S. Schneider
4. S. Neumeier
5. T. Dax

Citations in the corpus

• Rural Marginalisation and the Role of Social Innovation; A Turn Towards Nexogenous Development and Rural Reconnection (2016, unknown): “2005; Ray 2006; Shucksmith 2010).”
• Why do Social Innovations in Rural Development Matter and Should They be Considered More Seriously in Rural Development Research? – Proposal for a Stronger Focus on Social Innovations in Rural Development Research (2012, background): “1 The term ‘neo-endogenous development’ has been concretised by Ray (2006) to mean the process of development in the area of tension between bottom-up and top-down approaches (Ray 2006, p. 278).”
• The Leader programme 2007–2013: Enabling or disabling social innovation and neo-endogenous development? Insights from Austria and Ireland (2016, background): “Understanding processes of social innovation has therefore become increasingly important to the realization of neo-endogenous development strategies, such as those promoted through Leader programmes (Ray, 2006).”
• Identifying social innovations in European local rural development initiatives (2016, background): “Thus, rather than translating broader policy to “fit” into a locality, emphasizing the local setting allows alternative approaches to deliver potentially radically different solutions (Ray 2006).”
• Resistance strategies and diversification of rural livelihoods: the construction of autonomy among Brazilian family farmers (2010, background): “These strategies strengthen a ‘postproductivist’, territorialised, and endogenous development path by reconnecting production and consumption and embedding them in their socio-cultural context (Ploeg 2010, Isakson 2009, Ray 2006, Sonino and Marsden 2006, Winter 2003).”