GROUP COGNITIVE THERAPY: TREATMENT OF CHOICE OR SUB-OPTIMAL OPTION?

By N. Morrison. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 2001

118 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a4e3aa489a6bd93a2c9645dc35684a14c127a538

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Pim Cuijpers
2. Gerhard Andersson
3. Per Carlbring
4. Tian-Po Oei
5. Heleen Riper
6. Michelle K Tucker

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Gerhard Andersson
2. Per Carlbring
3. Tian-Po Oei
4. Michelle K Tucker

Citations in the corpus

• Internet-based vs. face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis (2018, background): “It could be argued that group CBT is a suboptimal comparison (Morrison, 2001), at least when it comes to patient preferences.”
• Guided Internet‐based vs. face‐to‐face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: a systematic review and meta‐analysis (2014, unknown): “Second, we compared against different formats of face-to-face therapy and it could be argued that group CBT is a suboptimal comparison (48), at least when it comes to patient preferences.”
• Is Group More Cost Effective than Individual Cognitive Behaviour Therapy? The Evidence is not Solid Yet (2007, background): “However, the disadvantages of individual therapy include high fiscal and time costs, and the patient’s missed opportunity to benefit from the effects of group dynamics (Lewinsohn and Clarke, 1999; Morrison, 2001).”