Guided Internet‐based vs. face‐to‐face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

1,044 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A review of cyberbullying and suggestions for online psychological therapy (2015, methodology): “…therapies such as Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT), Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT) and Psychodynamic Psychotherapy (PDT) have been moved online where consultation with a therapist takes place via mobile phones and/or email (Andersson et al., 2014; Dagöö et al., 2014; Johansson et al., 2012).”
Internet-based vs. face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis (2018, methodology): “In the original search (Andersson et al., 2014), there were no restrictions regarding publication date but data collection ended in June 2013.”
Physicians’ Perceptions of Chatbots in Health Care: Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey (2018, background): “…helping with diagnostic decision support [15,16], promoting and increasing physical activity [17], and cognitive behavioral therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders [18-24], which provide effective, acceptable, and practical health care with accuracy comparable with that of human physicians.”
The impact of digital technology on psychological treatments and their dissemination (2017, methodology): “This is the conclusion drawn by several systematic reviews and meta-analyses (e.g., Andersson et al., 2014; Cuijpers, Donker, van Straten, Li, & Andersson, 2010).”