To value or not to value? That is not the question

305 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Soil “Ecosystem” Services and Natural Capital: Critical Appraisal of Research on Uncertain Ground (2016, background): “However, right from the onset, this would eliminate the landless, people in the poorer social strata who have no or little land from which to provide ecosystem services (e.g., Kallis et al., 2013).”
In markets we trust? Setting the boundaries of Market-Based Instruments in ecosystem services governance (2015, background): “criteria should include both normative and practical considerations, such as environmental justice, incommensurability, transaction costs, and technical feasibility (Gustafsson, 1998; Kallis et al., 2013).”
Valuing Cultural Ecosystem Services (2016, background): “Towards a fair, constructive and consistent criticism of all valuation languages: comment on Kallis et al. 2013.”
The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Recent Instances for Debate (2013, background): “We side with the sceptics (McCauley 2006; Kosoy and Corbera 2010; Spangenberg and Settele 2010; Kallis et al. 2013) but we understand the logic of those who are keen to apply monetary valuation and payments for ecosystem services.”