Drivers, constraints and trade-offs associated with recultivating abandoned cropland in Russia, Ukraine and Kazakhstan

214 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Palaearctic steppe biome: a new synthesis (2016, background): “Where, when and how much cropland will eventually be recultivated is unclear (Meyfroidt et al. 2016).”
Trade-offs between environment and livelihoods: Bridging the global land use and food security discussions (2017, unknown): “Yet, of the 47.3 Mha that were lying idle across Russia, Ukraine and Kazakhstan in 2009, only 8.5 Mha could be considered as productive and recultivable without massive infrastructures investments or socio-economic revitalization policies, and with low environmental costs (Meyfroidt et al. 2016).”
Sustainable livelihoods in the global land rush? Archetypes of livelihood vulnerability and sustainability potentials. Keynote presentation. (2016, background): “The mechanismic approach complements this by identifying recurrent processes through which factors produce their effect (Meyfroidt, 2015).”