Sustainable livelihoods in the global land rush? Archetypes of livelihood vulnerability and sustainability potentials. Keynote presentation.

188 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Global Food‐Energy‐Water Nexus (2018, background): “, 2012; White, 2012), rise in social conflicts and dynamics of coercion (Dell’Angelo, D’Odorico, Rulli, & Marchand, 2017), and multidimensional impacts on rural livelihoods in developing countries (Davis et al., 2014a; Oberlack et al., 2016).”
Trade-offs between environment and livelihoods: Bridging the global land use and food security discussions (2017, unknown): “…or their interactions such as through outgrowers schemes (Herrmann 2017), but large-scale investments often result in smallholders’ marginalization (Oberlack et al. 2016), leaving them with little prospects outside agriculture due to the limited absorption capacity of other sectors of the economy…”
A review of the social-ecological systems framework: applications, methods, modifications, and challenges (2018, background): “Perhaps “interactions” could evolve into archetypes (e.g., Oberlack et al. 2016), typologies (e.g., Alessa et al. 2009), or bundles of interacting second-tier variables (e.g., Partelow et al. 2018a) from the other tiers.”
Middle-range theories of land system change (2018, background): “, recurring patterns or combinations of variables, processes, actors, situations, or outcomes (Schellnhuber et al., 1997; Oberlack et al., 2016; Valbuena et al., 2008; Levers et al., 2018).”