Variability in State Policy Priorities: An Empirical Analysis

By William G. Jacoby, Saundra K. Schneider. Journal of Politics, 2001

164 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a471f3466d4069b501e09dbf9878f832d8e9245c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

Intergovernmental Political Competition in American Federalism (2005, background): “…(t) are raised to cover the marginal costs (m) of 7 The ultimate level of demand for public spending within a state may be thought of as a result of public opinion (Erikson, Wright, and McIver 1993), interest group activities (Gray and Lowery 1996), and other sources (Jacoby and Schneider 2001).”
Politics, Interest Groups and State Funding of Public Higher Education (2010, background): “Specifically, it supports past findings asserting that the number of interest groups in a state influences state political activity, policy, and budgeting (Gray and Lowery 1999; Jacoby and Schneider 2001).”
The Dynamics of State Policy Liberalism, 1936–2014 (2016, background): “First, many are based on data from a long time span—over a decade, in the case of Wright, Erikson, and McIver (1987)—averaging over possibly large year-to-year changes in state policy (Jacoby and Schneider 2001).”
Horizontal Diffusion, Vertical Diffusion, and Internal Pressure in State Environmental Policymaking, 1989-1998 (2005, background): “Previous research has shown that interest groups are influential in setting state policy priorities (Jacoby & Schneider, 2001), as well as influential in some aspects of environmental policymaking (Gormley, 1983; Lowry, 1992; Potoski, 2001; Ringquist, 1994).”
Bargaining in Legislatures over Particularistic and Collective Goods (2007, background): “This monotonic view has been used to explain how particularistic and collective spending choices in the U.S. states reflect public opinion and interest group pressures (Jacoby and Schneider 2001).”