Implementing Six Sigma: Smarter Solutions Using Statistical Methods
By Martha M. Gardner. Technometrics, 2000
335 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a43fda1e87ad8e33459e7e247e85e221f09a8b98
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Jeff Sauro
- R. G. Schroeder
- Erika Kindlund
- K. Linderman
- Adrian S. Choo
- H. Wiklund
- P. Wiklund
- Charles A. Liedtke
Citations in the corpus
- Six Sigma: Definition and underlying theory (2008, methodology): “Stretch goals motivate team members to think ‘‘out of the box’’ (Breyfogle, 1999; Hamel, 2000).”
- A Multi-Project Model of Key Factors Affecting Organizational Benefits from Enterprise Systems (2010, background): “…(Garvin 1988; Samson and Terziovski 1999; Walton 1986), business process reengineering (Davenport 1993; Hammer 1996, 2007; Hammer and Champy 1993), and today’s SixSigma projects (Breyfogle 2003), all argue that process improvement is an important way to achieve greater organizational benefits.”
- A method to standardize usability metrics into a single score (2005, methodology): “This method of standardization was adapted from the process sigma metric used in Six Sigma [4],[17], [43].”
- Widening the Six Sigma concept: An approach to improve organizational learning (2002, background): “…& Francis Ltd DOI: 10.1080/09544120120102469 Six Sigma as an improvement programme has received considerable attention in the literature during the last few years (e.g. Bergman & Kroslid, 2000; Breyfogle, 1999; Harry, 1994, 1998; Hellsten & KlefsjoÈ , 2000, Hoerl, 1998; KlefsjoÈ et al., 2001).”