The adolescent brain.

By B. Casey, Sarah J. Getz, Adriana Galvan. Developmental Review, 2008

2,627 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a436a453650194b0d26bd659b432e198f0f955a0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

In Molecular Biology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Adolescent neurodevelopment. (2013, background): “Development of frontal regions into late adolescence/early adulthood is thought to result in relatively late maturation of “top-down” control systems that gradually strengthening their control over early emerging, largely subcortical “bottom-up” systems that are highly responsive to rewarding and em”
Adolescent risky decision-making: Neurocognitive development of reward and control regions (2010, background): “These findings support the hypothesis that risky behavior in adolescence follows from an imbalance caused by different developmental trajectories of motivational and regulatory brain circuitry (Casey et al. 2008; Galvan et al. 2006; Steinberg et al. 2008).”
Neural Correlates of Susceptibility to Group Opinions in Online Word-of-Mouth Recommendations (2015, background): “In particular, adolescent cognitive control systems that facilitate self-regulation mature differently than affective processing systems (Blakemore 2008, 2012; Casey, Getz, and Galvan 2008; Steinberg 2008) and function differently according to social context (Pfeifer and Allen 2012).”
Emotion regulation strategies and psychosocial well-being in adolescence (2016, positive): “…reward cues are particularly salient, leading to greater risk of suboptimal choices due to weaker EmR and less effective goal-oriented behavior (for detailed discussions, see Casey, Jones, & Hare, 2008; Silvers, Buhle, & Ochsner, 2014; Somerville & Casey, 2010; Spear, 2000; Steinberg, 2005).”
Neurobiology of the Adolescent Brain and Behavior (2010, positive): “ably worse than adolescents, given their less developed prefrontal cortex and cognitive abilities.(2) This review addresses the primary question of how the brain is changing during adolescence that may explain inflections in risky and impulsive behavior.”
The Human Sciences in a Biological Age (2013, background): “Neurobiological evidence about the specificity of ‘the adolescent brain’ (Casey et al., 2008) is being deployed in the United States in arguments seeking to mitigate the legal responsibility of young people.”
Adolescent risk taking, impulsivity, and brain development: implications for prevention. (2010, background): “This maturational gap in development of PFC-based control relative to more advanced motivational circuitry is said to result in an inevitable period of risk for adolescents (Casey et al., 2008; Nelson et al., 2002; Steinberg, 2008).”
Age differences in sensation seeking and impulsivity as indexed by behavior and self-report: evidence for a dual systems model. (2008, background): “Our finding of a linear decline in hasty behavior on the Tower of London is consistent with previous studies using this paradigm (e.g., Asato et al., 2006); numerous behavioral studies that compare children, adolescents, and adults on a range of self-regulatory tasks such as the antisaccade, flanker”
Social determinants of mental health (2014, neutral): “Depression in adolescence is linked with adverse childhood experiences (Bell et al., 2013; Wickrama et al., 2008) and risk taking in adolescence (including substance misuse) which affects development (Campion, 2013; Casey et al., 2008).”