Acoustic monitoring in terrestrial environments using microphone arrays: applications, technological considerations and prospectus
By Daniel T. Blumstein, D. Mennill, Patrick J. Clemins, Lewis Girod, Kung Yao, G. Patricelli, Jill L. Deppe, Alan H. Krakauer, Christopher W. Clark, Kathryn Cortopassi and 4 more. 2011
601 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental Biology, Ecology, Signal Processing
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a42ab97d6cd8323003cd0937e71d8c6cd73d9a59
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental Biology
- Adelaide V. Lindseth
- C. Pérez‐Granados
- Paul Glover‐Kapfer
- Toby Gifford
- P. Lobel
- J. Traba
- Simon Linke
- Rory Gibb
In Ecology
- P. Batáry
- Toby Gifford
- C. Desjonquères
- Simon Linke
- Adelaide V. Lindseth
- C. Pérez‐Granados
- Paul Glover‐Kapfer
- Roger Mundry
In Signal Processing
Citations in the corpus
- Underwater Soundscape Monitoring and Fish Bioacoustics: A Review (2018, methodology): “These methods of localizing sources of sounds reduces the number of differences detected in recordings and allows for more accurate counts of individual sound producers [71,99,101].”
- Comparing the sampling performance of sound recorders versus point counts in bird surveys: A meta‐analysis (2018, background): “…using drones; Vermeulen, Lejeune, Lisein, Sawadogo, & Bouché, 2013), use more microphones than there are human ears (like in microphone arrays, see Blumstein et al., 2011) and even extend the sampling domain to record sound inaudible to humans with ultrasonic microphones (e.g. for bats and…”
- Passive acoustic monitoring as a potential tool to survey animal and ecosystem processes in freshwater environments (2019, methodology): “With the advent of autonomous and weather resistant recorders, long‐term PAM can be undertaken with rea‐ sonable efforts and costs (Blumstein et al., 2011; Linke, Gifford, et al., 2018).”
- Emerging opportunities and challenges for passive acoustics in ecological assessment and monitoring (2018, background): “In contrast, PAM involves recording sound using passive acoustic sensors (recorders, ultrasound detectors, microphones and/or hydrophones; henceforth “acoustic sensors”) (Blumstein et al., 2011) and subsequently deriving relevant data from audio (e.”
- Applications of machine learning in animal behaviour studies (2017, neutral): “…Crofoot, Jetz, &Wikelski, 2015; Tomkiewicz, Fuller, Kie, & Bates, 2010), fine-scale motion (Brown, Kays, Wikelski, Wilson, & Klimley, 2013), social interactions (Krause et al., 2013), vocalizations (Blumstein et al., 2011) and physiological responses (Kramer & Kinter, 2003) of individual animals.”
- Assessing the performance of a semi‐automated acoustic monitoring system for primates (2015, methodology): “It is often implemented as an alternative, or complement, to existing monitoring methods to collect site-specific data on the distribution and diversity of species (Blumstein et al. 2011).”
- Estimating bird density using passive acoustic monitoring: a review of methods and suggestions for further research (2021, background): “The basic assumption is that recordings made using an array of microphones can be used to infer the position of vocalizing individuals on the basis of the time delay for the arrival of the signals at different microphones (Dawson & Efford 2009, see review in Blumstein et al .”