Assessing the performance of a semi‐automated acoustic monitoring system for primates

By Stefanie Heinicke, Ammie K. Kalan, Oliver J. J. Wagner, Roger Mundry, Hanna M. Lukashevich, Hjalmar S. Kühl. 2015

161 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental Biology, Ecology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8230b10230e7bacf3de21c671e0ee6d2a2a702a5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental Biology

In Ecology

Citations in the corpus

Robust sound event detection in bioacoustic sensor networks (2019, background): “In this context, one emerging application is the species-specific inventory of vocalizing animals [12], such as birds [13], primates [14], and marine mammals [15], whose occurrence in time and space reflects the magnitude of population movements [16], and can be correlated with other environmental v”
Emerging opportunities and challenges for passive acoustics in ecological assessment and monitoring (2018, methodology): “Efficient automated systems are therefore prerequisites for scaling up PAM studies, with innovations in machine learning increasingly applied to bioacoustic signal recognition (Aide et al., 2013; Bittle & Duncan, 2013; Heinicke et al., 2015; Walters et al., 2012).”
Comparing the sampling performance of sound recorders versus point counts in bird surveys: A meta‐analysis (2018, unknown): “…are most often used to survey birds (Shonfield & Bayne, 2017) and marine mammals (Sousa- Lima, Norris, Oswald, & Fernandes, 2013); but primates (Heinicke et al., 2015), bats (Kloepper et al., 2016), insects (Lehmann, Frommolt, Lehmann, & Riede, 2014) and amphibians (Measey, Stevenson, Scott,…”
Acoustic monitoring for conservation in tropical forests: examples from forest elephants (2017, background): “…& Szewczak 2014; Whitby et al. 2014), particularly to study community diversity, but there has been recent interest in detecting primates (e.g. Heinicke et al. 2015; Kalan et al. 2015), studying the ecology of, and human impacts on elephants (Wrege et al. 2010, 2012), and for surveys and…”
Bioacoustic monitoring of animal vocal behavior for conservation (2019, background): “Recognizer performance is also affected by the distance of the calling individual from the sound recorder, given loss of amplitude as well as attenuation of high frequency sound components (Digby, Towsey, Bell, & Teal, 2013; Heinicke et al., 2015; SebastiánGonzález et al., 2015).”
Passive acoustic monitoring as a potential tool to survey animal and ecosystem processes in freshwater environments (2019, methodology): “The use of passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) as a non‐invasive ecoacoustic method to sample and monitor ecosystems is gaining traction globally (Blumstein et al., 2011; Furnas & Callas, 2015; Felisberto et al., 2015; Heinicke et al., 2015; Gibb, Browning, Glover‐Kapfer, & Jones, 2018; 2010).”