Control of stream insect assemblages: roles of spatial configuration and local environmental factors

130 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Metacommunity organisation, spatial extent and dispersal in aquatic systems: patterns, processes and prospects (2015, unknown): “Thus, ecologists may draw inconsistent conclusions about metacommunity organisation if a study is based on only a single point in time (Heino & Mykr€a, 2008; Er}os et al., 2012a).”
Dispersal traits drive the phylogenetic distance decay of similarity in Neotropical stream metacommunities (2015, background): “Third, there were several large rivers and lakes in the water routes; we do not believe that headwater species would inhabit these bodies (Heino & Mykr€a, 2008).”
The role of dispersal in river network metacommunities: Patterns, processes, and pathways (2018, background): “541 Many researchers have relied on Euclidean distances to examine metacommunity structure of 542 benthic invertebrates (Heino et al., 2015a; Heino & Mykrä, 2008; Thompson & Townsend, 543 2006) often based on the fact that comparisons of Euclidean and watercourse distances have 544 revealed little…”
A macroecological perspective of trait patterns in stream communities (2013, background): “It may well be that, similarly to variation in species composition in natural environmental settings (Heino & Mykrä, 2008; Mykrä et al., 2011), also trait composition of communities varies both spatially and temporally in stream ecosystems.”