How much do site age, habitat structure and spatial isolation influence the restoration of rainforest beetle species assemblages?

92 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Measuring the success of reforestation for restoring biodiversity and ecosystem functioning (2016, result): “S4), confirming patterns 348 found by similar studies (Grimbacher and Catterall 2007, Audino et al. 2014).”
Integrating plant- and animal-based perspectives for more effective restoration of biodiversity (2016, background): “Suitable resources may be available, but limited dispersal ability of less- mobile species and poor landscape connectivity may delay colonization (Grimbacher and Catterall 2007 ).”
Spatiotemporal changes of beetle communities across a tree diversity gradient (2009, background): “Alternative hypotheses to explain differences in forest beetle diversity are previous or current human disturbance (Nilsson & Baranowski, 1997; Goßner et al., 2006) and stand age (Hammond et al., 2004; Grimbacher & Catterall, 2007) or stand productivity, which are negligible in our case.”
Effects of vegetation structure and floristic diversity on detritivore, herbivore and predatory invertebrates within calcareous grasslands (2009, background): “However, it is likely that given sufficient time such dispersal limitation could be overcome and flightless species would colonise (Grimbacher and Catterall 2007).”