The use of willingness‐to‐pay approaches in mammal conservation

By Piran C. L. White, Alison C. Bennett, E. Hayes. 2001

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Economics and Econometrics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a3a7b27d59e814ec332a19684d107aad6b39c062

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Citations in the corpus

Birds as tourism flagship species: a case study of tropical islands (2009, result): “Appearance was the third most important attribute in our model, providing some support for the widely held notion that physical appearance can override other considerations in flagship selection and in terms of WTP (Metrick & Weitzman, 1996; White et al., 2001).”
The Net Benefit of Saving the Asian Elephant: A Policy and Contingent Valuation Study (2004, background): “…ecological criteria, in the last two decades, several authors have emphasised the usefulness of economic valuation as a wildlife management tool (Gregory et al.1989; Stevens, et al. 1991; Whitehead, 1992; Loomis and White, 1996; Hadker et al. 1997; Tisdell and Xiang, 1998; and White et al. 2001).”
Contingent valuation of ecotourism in Annapurna conservation area, Nepal: implications for sustainable park finance and local development. (2008, background): “Most of the variables tested have shown significant predictability in other contingent valuation studies regarding natural resources (Moran, 1994; Loomis and Gonzalez-Caban, 1998; Shultz et al., 1998; White et al., 2001; Lee and Han, 2002).”
Stated preferences for tropical wildlife conservation amongst distant beneficiaries: Charisma, endemism, scope and substitution effects (2012, unknown): “…domestic) wildlife, the literature indicates that respondents are sensitive to certain types of wildlife, in particular, respondents are willing to pay significantly more for 'charismatic' or 'flagship' species compared with uncharismatic ones (see Richardson and Loomis, 2009; White et al., 2001).”
The value of green walls to urban biodiversity (2017, background): “When cost or price is included as an attribute, marginal utility estimates can be obtained and converted into willingness to pay (WTP), thus providing a monetary value (Bartkowski et al., 2015; Jones-Walters and Mulder, 2009).”
Economic valuation of species loss in the open sea (2011, background): “A large body of literature has concluded a strong public preference for the allocation of conservation funds to likeable and charismatic individual species (White et al., 1997, 2001; Metrick and Weitzman, 1996; Loomis and White, 1996).”
REVIEW: Questionnaires in ecology: a review of past use and recommendations for best practice (2005, methodology): “conservation strategies and/or the implementation of environmental conservation directives (Kerr & Cullen 1995; White et al. 1997; White, Bennett & Hayes 2001; Jim & Xu 2002; Obiri & Lawes 2002; Bouton & Frederick 2003; White et al. 2003).”