How unaware are the unskilled? Empirical tests of the “signal extraction” counterexplanation for the Dunning–Kruger effect in self-evaluation of performance

By Thomas Schlösser, D. Dunning, Kerri L. Johnson, Justin Kruger. 2013

193 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a38704facf73e00523bff8182d9b9fa49c93aa39

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Marcin Zajenkowski
2. Gilles E. Gignac
3. Lisa Wagner

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Gilles E. Gignac

In General Decision Sciences

1. Marcin Zajenkowski
2. Gilles E. Gignac

Citations in the corpus

• The Dunning-Kruger effect is (mostly) a statistical artefact: Valid approaches to testing the hypothesis with individual differences data (2020, result): “The observation of a significant difference in the means, with a downward slopping trend in the means, has been suggested to be supportive of the Dunning-Kruger hypothesis (Schlösser et al., 2013).”