Two proposals for causal grammars
By T. Griffiths, Josh Tenenbaum. 2007
63 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Language and Linguistics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a35b41c88601fc21515a7e63ac8ee8b8fb9e9804
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Josh Tenenbaum
- T. Griffiths
- Charles Kemp
- Song-Chun Zhu
- Alison Gopnik
- Christopher G. Lucas
- Peter S. Dayan
- Amy Sue Fire
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Josh Tenenbaum
- T. Griffiths
- Charles Kemp
- Alison Gopnik
- Christopher G. Lucas
- Tomer D. Ullman
- Song-Chun Zhu
- Amy Sue Fire
In Language and Linguistics
- Alison Gopnik
- T. Griffiths
- Charles Kemp
- Christopher G. Lucas
- Song-Chun Zhu
- Amy Sue Fire
- Josh Tenenbaum
Citations in the corpus
- Reconstructing constructivism: Causal models, Bayesian learning mechanisms and the theory theory (2012, unknown): “Over the past 10 years, a number of researchers have explored whether children might have Bayes net–like representations of causal structure and whether they can learn causal structure from evidence in the way that the formalism suggests.”
- Bayesian models of cognition (2008, methodology): “…acquisition (Chater & Manning, 2006; Xu & Tenenbaum, in press), symbolic reasoning (Oaksford & Chater, 2001), causal learning and inference (Steyvers, Tenenbaum, Wagenmakers, & Blum, 2003; Griffiths & Tenenbaum, 2005, 2007a), and social cognition (Baker, Tenenbaum, & Saxe, 2007), among other topics.”
- Theory-based causal induction. (2009, background): “Hagmayer and Waldmann (2002) presented an elegant series of studies that showed that different assumptions about the delay between cause and effect could lead to different interpretation of the same set of events, determining which events were assumed to be related.”
- Using Causal Induction in Humans to Learn and Infer Causality from Video (2013, background): “Although Bayesian networks are commonly used to represent causality (Pearl, 2009), grammar models have the expressive power to represent a greater breadth of possibilities than a single instance of a Bayesian network (Griffiths & Tenenbaum, 2007).”
- Formalizing Neurath’s Ship: Approximate Algorithms for Online Causal Learning (2016, background): “Such representations enable humans to exploit their physical and social environments in flexible and inherently model-based ways (Dolan & Dayan, 2013; Griffiths & Tenenbaum, 2007; Sloman, 2005).”
- When Younger Learners Can Be Better (or at Least More Open-Minded) Than Older Ones (2015, methodology): “cognitive development, causal learning, Bayesian models, simulated annealing hypotheses about which kinds of more specific hypotheses are likely (Griffiths & Tenenbaum 2007; Kemp, Perfors, & Tenenbaum, 2007).”
- Learning Perceptual Causality from Video (2013, background): “To represent causal knowledge, a grammar model is needed (Bayesian networks lack their expressive power) (Griffiths and Tenenbaum 2007).”