Economic feasibility of producing ethanol from lignocellulosic feedstocks

By Michael S. Kaylen, D. Dyne, Youn-Sang Choi, M. Blasé. 2000

197 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Hemicellulose biorefineries: a review on biomass pretreatments (2008, background): “As a catalyst, sulphuric acid (H 2 SO 4 ) is most commonly used although other mineral acids [hydrochloric (HCl), nitric (HNO 3 ) and trifluoracetic acid (TFA)] have also been assayed.”
Fuel ethanol production: process design trends and integration opportunities. (2007, methodology): “Although some authors have developed own cost evaluation modes (Kaylen et al., 2000; Nguyen and Saddler, 1991), commercial process simulators allow in a more generic and available way the visualization of the interdependences among process units, the same as the effect that different options have ov”
Ethanol fermentation from biomass resources: current state and prospects (2006, background): “In fact, because raw material cost comprises more than 20% of the production cost (Brown et al. 2001; Kaylen et al. 2000; Zhuang et al. 2001), the optimization of the cellulose conversion should be accomplished by correct management and utilization of all process streams.”
Bioethanol supply chain system planning under supply and demand uncertainties (2012, background): “…(Atchison and Hettenhaus, 2004; Graham et al., 2000; Hamelinck et al., 2005; Kumar et al., 2005; Mahmudi and Flynn, 2006) and economic feasibility analysis of the conversion technologies (Kaylen et al., 2000; Kumar et al., 2003; Petrolia, 2008; Wallace et al., 2005; Zhan et al., 2005).”