DOSAGE RESPONSE OF AN INDUCED DEFENSE: HOW SENSITIVE ARE TADPOLES TO PREDATION RISK?

By J. Van Buskirk, Martina Arioli. 2002

192 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a2eac7b1aea25107fe397bb3e227d2eae2fd0ad0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. D. W. Sims
2. O. Kishida
3. Kinya Nishimura
4. J. Van Buskirk
5. S. Peacor
6. G. Trussell
7. Andrew M. Turner
8. Jens Krause

In Genetics

1. O. Kishida
2. Kinya Nishimura
3. S. Peacor
4. Andrew M. Turner
5. J. Van Buskirk
6. Jens Krause
7. G. Trussell
8. A. Mougi

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. D. W. Sims
2. S. Peacor
3. O. Kishida
4. Kinya Nishimura
5. Andrew M. Turner
6. T. Guttridge
7. J. Van Buskirk
8. Jens Krause

Citations in the corpus

• Deep danger: intra-specific predation risk influences habitat use and aggregation formation of juvenile lemon sharks Negaprion brevirostris (2012, background): “…not permitted without written consent of the publisher Mar Ecol Prog Ser 445: 279–291, 2012 taxa have demonstrated that responses to predation risk can result in changes in morphology (Nilsson et al. 1995, Van Buskirk & Arioli 2002) and behaviour (Creel & Christianson 2008, Lima 2009).”
• Evolutionary ecology of inducible morphological plasticity in predator–prey interaction: toward the practical links with population ecology (2009, background): “For example, inducible defense and offense in the morphology of ciliates and larval amphibians correlate with the density (Van Buskirk and Arioli 2002; Relyea 2004) and individual performance of the interacting species (Wicklow 1988; Kopp and Tollrian 2003b; Kishida et al. 2006).”
• PHENOTYPIC LABILITY AND THE EVOLUTION OF PREDATOR‐INDUCED PLASTICITY IN TADPOLES (2002, background): “…that West-Eberhard’s proposal remains plausible because at least some of the traits are sufficiently independent to exhibit different temporal responses to environmental change, and because behavioral and morphological responses are triggered by different cues (Van Buskirk and Arioli 2002).”
• SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL SCALES OF PREDATOR AVOIDANCE: EXPERIMENTS WITH FISH AND SNAILS (2003, background): “Vanni, M. J., and C. D. Layne.”
• Behavioural response of bullfrog tadpoles to chemical cues of predation risk are affected by cue age and water source (2006, background): “However, as with other aquatic organisms (Tollrian & Harvell, 1999), tadpoles respond to predators without direct encounters via chemical cues ( Van Buskirk & Arioli, 2002 ).”
• Improving data analysis in herpetology: Using Akaike's information criterion (AIC) to assess the strength of biological hypotheses (2006, unknown): “Some herpetological papers have used the approach in general journals (e.g., Van Buskirk and Arioli, 2002; Weyrauch and Grubb, 2004; Bailey et al., 2004), but most herpetologists seem unaware of these methods.”